Senate Bill 553
Assessment on critical access hospitals; payments to critical access hospitals under the Medical Assistance Program; creating a rural physician residency assistance program; the physician, dentist, and health care provider loan assistance programs; and making appropriations
Topics: Health Services, Department of: Health, Hospitals, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Medical assistance, Medical education, Physician, University of Wisconsin: Regents, University of Wisconsin: School of Medicine and Public Health
Stopped before the full Senate voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 24, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Hospital Assessments The state currently collects an assessment from hospitals based on their gross inpatient and outpatient revenues. The biennial budget act specifies the total amount of revenue to be collected from the assessment. The Department of Health Services (DHS) then sets the assessment rate, which is the same for all hospitals, at the percentage of gross patient revenue necessary to collect the total revenue amount specified in the biennial budget act. Critical access hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and institutions for mental diseases are exempt from the assessment. A critical access hospital is, in general, a hospital that provides 24 hour a day emergency care, has 25 or fewer acute inpatient beds, and is located in a rural area in which there are no other hospitals.
Current law directs DHS to use a portion of the hospital assessment revenue to pay hospitals that are subject to the assessment for services provided under the Medical Assistance Program (MA). Like other provider payments under MA, the federal government pays a share of these MA payments to hospitals. Current law requires that the MA payments to hospitals from the assessment revenue, together with the federal share, equal the amount of the assessment revenue divided by 61.68 percent (i.e., 1.62 times the amount of assessment revenue). The remainder of the assessment revenue is appropriated for other MA expenditures.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill imposes an assessment on the gross inpatient revenues of critical access hospitals. The rate for the critical access hospital assessment is the same as the rate of the current hospital assessment. The bill requires that DHS use a portion of the critical access hospital assessment revenue to pay critical access hospitals for services provided under MA. Like the current hospital assessment, the bill requires that the MA payments to critical access hospitals from the critical access hospital assessment revenue, together with the federal share of payments, equal the amount of the critical access hospital assessment revenue divided by 61.68 percent. The bill annually appropriates $1,000,000 of critical access hospital assessment revenue for health care provider loans and rural physician residency assistance, described below.
The remainder of critical access hospital assessment revenue is appropriated for other MA expenditures.
The provisions in the bill for payment to critical access hospitals under MA apply to services provided beginning July 1, 2010. The first critical access hospital assessment payments are due by September 30, 2010. The bill requires DHS to submit a state Medicaid plan amendment to the federal government to implement the critical access hospital assessment as provided for in the bill, and specifies that if the federal government disapproves the state plan amendment, DHS must discontinue the assessment on critical access hospitals and refund any critical access hospital assessment revenue collected in fiscal year 2010-11.
Health care provider loan programs With certain exceptions, current law authorizes the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to repay, on behalf of certain physicians and dentists, up to $50,000 in educational loans if the physician or dentist agrees to practice for three years in certain areas of this state. Similarly, the board may repay, on behalf of certain health care providers (a dental hygienist, physician assistant, nurse-midwife, or nurse-practitioner), up to $25,000 in educational loans if the health care provider agrees to practice for three years in certain areas of this state.
This bill provides additional funds for these programs, from critical access hospital assessment revenues, for certain physicians, dentists, and health care providers who agree to practice in a rural area of this state. A rural area is a city, town, or village with a population of less than 20,000 that is at least 15 miles from any city, town, or village that has a population of at least 20,000, or an area that is not an urbanized area, as defined by the federal bureau of the census. The bill also increases the maximum amount of the loan repayment from $50,000 to $100,000 for a physician who agrees to practice in a rural area.
Rural physician residency assistance program This bill directs the Department of Family Medicine in the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health to establish and support certain physician residency positions at hospitals located in rural areas or at clinics staffed by physicians who admit patients to hospitals located in rural areas, or that include a rural rotation, begun after June 30, 2010, which consists of at least eight weeks of training experience in a hospital located in a rural area or in a clinic that is staffed by physicians who admit patients to a hospital located in a rural area. The positions are funded with revenue from the critical access hospital assessment.
The bill directs the department annually to submit a plan for increasing the number of physician residency programs that include a majority of training experience in a rural area to the Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative, the Wisconsin Hospital Association, and the Wisconsin Medical Society. The department must also annually submit to the Joint Committee on Finance a report indicating the number of physician residency positions that include a majority of training experience in a rural area of this state, and information about each such residency position.
Who's behind it
14 senators are its . 11 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
27 more lawmakers .
See all 41 names Hide the names
Authors (14)
- Alan Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Jauch · Democrat, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (27)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Phil Garthwaite · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Kim Hixson · Democrat, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Mary Hubler · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- John Murtha · Republican, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
- Shilling
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeffrey Wood · Independent, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Public Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 11, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 13 to 3 · Mar 17, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 26, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 17, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 3.
-
Mar 12, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 11, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 2, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 24, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation.
-
Feb 24, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Miller, Olsen, Schultz, Vinehout, Coggs, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Jauch, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lehman, Robson and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Hraychuck, Ballweg, Garthwaite, Benedict, Berceau, Bies, Brooks, Clark, Danou, Dexter, Hebl, Hilgenberg, Hixson, Hubler, Jorgensen, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Murtha, Roys, Schneider, Shilling, Sinicki, Smith, Spanbauer, Townsend, Vruwink and Wood
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 11, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 3
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 26, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote