Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 553

Assessment on critical access hospitals; payments to critical access hospitals under the Medical Assistance Program; creating a rural physician residency assistance program; the physician, dentist, and health care provider loan assistance programs; and making appropriations

Topics: Health Services, Department of: Health, Hospitals, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Medical assistance, Medical education, Physician, University of Wisconsin: Regents, University of Wisconsin: School of Medicine and Public Health

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 24, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Hospital Assessments The state currently collects an assessment from hospitals based on their gross inpatient and outpatient revenues. The biennial budget act specifies the total amount of revenue to be collected from the assessment. The Department of Health Services (DHS) then sets the assessment rate, which is the same for all hospitals, at the percentage of gross patient revenue necessary to collect the total revenue amount specified in the biennial budget act. Critical access hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and institutions for mental diseases are exempt from the assessment. A critical access hospital is, in general, a hospital that provides 24 hour a day emergency care, has 25 or fewer acute inpatient beds, and is located in a rural area in which there are no other hospitals.

Current law directs DHS to use a portion of the hospital assessment revenue to pay hospitals that are subject to the assessment for services provided under the Medical Assistance Program (MA). Like other provider payments under MA, the federal government pays a share of these MA payments to hospitals. Current law requires that the MA payments to hospitals from the assessment revenue, together with the federal share, equal the amount of the assessment revenue divided by 61.68 percent (i.e., 1.62 times the amount of assessment revenue). The remainder of the assessment revenue is appropriated for other MA expenditures.

Read the full summary

This bill imposes an assessment on the gross inpatient revenues of critical access hospitals. The rate for the critical access hospital assessment is the same as the rate of the current hospital assessment. The bill requires that DHS use a portion of the critical access hospital assessment revenue to pay critical access hospitals for services provided under MA. Like the current hospital assessment, the bill requires that the MA payments to critical access hospitals from the critical access hospital assessment revenue, together with the federal share of payments, equal the amount of the critical access hospital assessment revenue divided by 61.68 percent. The bill annually appropriates $1,000,000 of critical access hospital assessment revenue for health care provider loans and rural physician residency assistance, described below.

The remainder of critical access hospital assessment revenue is appropriated for other MA expenditures.

The provisions in the bill for payment to critical access hospitals under MA apply to services provided beginning July 1, 2010. The first critical access hospital assessment payments are due by September 30, 2010. The bill requires DHS to submit a state Medicaid plan amendment to the federal government to implement the critical access hospital assessment as provided for in the bill, and specifies that if the federal government disapproves the state plan amendment, DHS must discontinue the assessment on critical access hospitals and refund any critical access hospital assessment revenue collected in fiscal year 2010-11.

Health care provider loan programs With certain exceptions, current law authorizes the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System to repay, on behalf of certain physicians and dentists, up to $50,000 in educational loans if the physician or dentist agrees to practice for three years in certain areas of this state. Similarly, the board may repay, on behalf of certain health care providers (a dental hygienist, physician assistant, nurse-midwife, or nurse-practitioner), up to $25,000 in educational loans if the health care provider agrees to practice for three years in certain areas of this state.

This bill provides additional funds for these programs, from critical access hospital assessment revenues, for certain physicians, dentists, and health care providers who agree to practice in a rural area of this state. A rural area is a city, town, or village with a population of less than 20,000 that is at least 15 miles from any city, town, or village that has a population of at least 20,000, or an area that is not an urbanized area, as defined by the federal bureau of the census. The bill also increases the maximum amount of the loan repayment from $50,000 to $100,000 for a physician who agrees to practice in a rural area.

Rural physician residency assistance program This bill directs the Department of Family Medicine in the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health to establish and support certain physician residency positions at hospitals located in rural areas or at clinics staffed by physicians who admit patients to hospitals located in rural areas, or that include a rural rotation, begun after June 30, 2010, which consists of at least eight weeks of training experience in a hospital located in a rural area or in a clinic that is staffed by physicians who admit patients to a hospital located in a rural area. The positions are funded with revenue from the critical access hospital assessment.

The bill directs the department annually to submit a plan for increasing the number of physician residency programs that include a majority of training experience in a rural area to the Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative, the Wisconsin Hospital Association, and the Wisconsin Medical Society. The department must also annually submit to the Joint Committee on Finance a report indicating the number of physician residency positions that include a majority of training experience in a rural area of this state, and information about each such residency position.

Who's behind it

14 senators are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

27 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 41 names

Authors (14)

Signed on in support (27)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Public Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 11, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 3 · Mar 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 26, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 3.

  4. Mar 12, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  5. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  6. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Mar 2, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Feb 24, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation.

  9. Feb 24, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Miller, Olsen, Schultz, Vinehout, Coggs, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Jauch, A. Lasee, Lassa, Lehman, Robson and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Hraychuck, Ballweg, Garthwaite, Benedict, Berceau, Bies, Brooks, Clark, Danou, Dexter, Hebl, Hilgenberg, Hixson, Hubler, Jorgensen, Milroy, Molepske Jr., Murtha, Roys, Schneider, Shilling, Sinicki, Smith, Spanbauer, Townsend, Vruwink and Wood

  2. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation

  3. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Public Health, Senior Issues, Long-Term Care, and Job Creation, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  7. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 12, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 13, Noes 3

  11. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  15. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote