Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 557

Notices concerning construction near or on lakes, streams, or wetlands that are given to applicants for building permits and other construction approvals, requiring the Department of Natural Resources to furnish informational brochures about wetlands laws, requiring the Department of Natural Resources to provide evaluations and statements about whether certain land contains wetlands, and making an appropriation

Topics: Building, Commerce, Department of, Maps, Municipality, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection, United States: Army, Wetland

Became law

The governor signed it on May 18, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 24, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 95 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 373

Latest entry in the official record, May 20, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to provide certain services relating to wetlands to persons who own or lease land. Under the bill, a wetland is an area where water is at, near, or above the land surface long enough to be capable of supporting aquatic or hydrophytic vegetation and that has soils indicative of wet conditions. The bill requires DNR to provide, for a fee, a wetland map review, a wetland identification, or a wetland confirmation upon request by a person who owns or leases land.

Under the bill, a wetland map review consists of a written evaluation, based upon a review of wetland maps prepared by DNR or other information available to DNR, of whether a parcel of land is likely to contain a wetland. A wetland identification consists of a written evaluation, based upon an on-site inspection of the land by DNR, of whether a parcel of land contains a wetland. A wetland confirmation consists of a written statement, based upon an on-site inspection of the land by DNR, of whether DNR concurs with the boundaries of a wetland as delineated by a third person.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that, if DNR furnishes a wetland identification or a wetland confirmation, that identification or confirmation is effective for a period of five years.

The bill requires DNR to negotiate with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps of Engineers) to enter into a memorandum of agreement that provides that the Corps of Engineers will concur with any written evaluation by DNR of whether a parcel of land contains a wetland for purposes of a wetland identification. The bill also specifies that DNR may not provide a wetland identification before the date on which it enters into such a memorandum with the Corps of Engineers.

The bill establishes deadlines under which DNR must provide these wetlands-related services after a person files a request for the service. The bill specifies that, if adverse weather conditions or other adverse conditions prevent DNR from conducting an accurate on-site inspection for a wetland identification or a wetland confirmation, DNR may provide the service as soon as possible after conditions allow DNR to conduct an accurate on-site inspection.

The bill also requires that each county, city, village, and town (municipality) that issues a building permit or other approval for construction activity must give the applicant a written notice that contains information about construction near or on wetlands including a statement that advises the applicant that the applicant is responsible for complying with state and federal laws concerning construction near or on wetlands, lakes, and streams. The bill requires the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to include this notice on every standard building permit form that it prescribes. The bill provides that a municipality is not required to give the notice if it issues a building permit on a standard building permit form prescribed by Commerce. If the municipality is required to give the notice, the bill provides that the municipality must require the applicant for the building permit to sign a statement acknowledging that the person has received the notice.

The bill also requires DNR to furnish an informational brochure to municipalities for distribution to the public that describes the laws that apply to wetlands.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Environment vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 8, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Apr 13, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 95 to 0 · Apr 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 95, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 20, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 18, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 373.

  3. May 13, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 95 to 0.

  5. Apr 14, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 14, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  8. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Apr 8, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  10. Apr 8, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Apr 5, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  12. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  13. Apr 2, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  14. Mar 31, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Mar 17, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Mar 16, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Mar 11, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Feb 24, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Environment.

  19. Feb 24, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, A. Lasee, Miller, Hansen, Cowles, Taylor, Robson, Lehman, Holperin and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Bies, Zigmunt, Zepnick, Petrowski, Townsend, Mursau and Berceau

  2. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Environment

  3. Mar 11, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    LRB correction

  7. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Kreitlow

  8. Mar 31, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Apr 1, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Apr 2, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Apr 2, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Apr 2, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Apr 5, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  15. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  16. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  17. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  26. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 by committee on Rules

  28. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  29. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  31. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 95, Noes 0

  32. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  34. May 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-7-2010

  35. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  36. May 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 373

  37. May 20, 2010 · Senate

    Published 6-1-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote