Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 561

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

evidentiary recordings of persons under the age of 18 engaging in sexually explicit conduct and attempt of certain sex crimes against children and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a district attorney must disclose to the defense, and permit

the defense to inspect, copy, or photograph, any physical evidence that the district

attorney intends to use as evidence against that defendant in a trial. Under this bill,

if the evidence is a recording of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct, the

defense may inspect the recording only in a location maintained by the court or a law

enforcement agency, one of which must, under this bill, retain possession, custody,

and control of the recording and must provide the defense opportunity to examine,

inspect, and view the recording. The defense may receive a copy for limited purposes

only if a court finds that the defense has not had opportunity to examine, inspect, or

view the recording.

Under current law, a person who causes a person under the age of 18 to view

or listen to sexually explicit conduct is guilty of a felony if the viewing or listening

is for sexual arousal or gratification of the actor or for humiliating or degrading the

person under the age of 18. Also under current law, a person who communicates via

a computer with an individual whom the person believes is under 16 years old with

the intent to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact with an individual under 16

years old is guilty of a felony. This bill makes the attempt to do either of these crimes

a felony punishable as the completed crime would currently be punishable.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,

the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a

report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to

result if the bill is enacted.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Lassa (D) , Sullivan (D)

5 cosponsors

A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Brooks (R) , Staskunas (D) , Suder (R)

Full history

  1. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Lassa and Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Staskunas, Berceau, Brooks and Suder

  2. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 22, 2010 · Senate

    Representative A. Williams added as a cosponsor

  7. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Mar 26, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1