Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
weight limitations for vehicles transporting raw forest products.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate upon a
highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles that exceeds certain statutory weight
limits unless the person obtains a permit issued by the Department of
Transportation (DOT) or a local highway authority. DOT may issue annual or
consecutive month permits for the transportation of raw forest products in vehicle
combinations having a gross weight not exceeding 98,000 pounds if the vehicle
combination has six or more axles and meets other criteria (RS permit). A vehicle
combination operated under an RS permit is subject to certain operating restrictions,
including that it cannot be operated on an interstate highway. "Raw forest products"
includes logs, poles, cordwood, wood chips, sawdust, and pulpwood.
Also under current law, DOT or a local highway authority may impose special
weight limits on highways that, because of weakness of the roadbed due to
deterioration or climatic conditions or other special or temporary conditions, would
likely be seriously damaged or destroyed in the absence of the special limits. If
special weight limits are imposed, the limits must be posted by highway signs along
the affected highways. The special weight limits apply regardless of whether a
vehicle is being operated under an overweight permit unless the permit expressly
authorizes the special weight limits to be exceeded.
Under this bill, each RS permit must expressly authorize the vehicle
combination to exceed any special weight limits imposed in connection with the
thawing of frozen highways and to be operated at the full allowable weight of up to
98,000 pounds.
Under current law, if a vehicle's per-axle weight is over limits prescribed by law
by not more than 2,000 pounds and the vehicle's load can be reloaded within the
normal load carrying areas to eliminate the excess per-axle weight, the operator may
reload up to 2,000 pounds and no forfeiture may be imposed. In lieu of reloading the
vehicle, the operator may choose to continue operating the vehicle above the per-axle
weight limit and pay a forfeiture of $50 for failure to reload the vehicle.
This bill affords the same opportunity to reload up to 2,000 pounds, or pay a
forfeiture of $50 for failure to reload, for a vehicle combination being operated under
an RS permit if the vehicle combination exceeds, by not more than 2,000 pounds, any
per-axle weight limit specified in the RS permit.
Because this bill concerns an exception to the vehicle weight limits specified in
ch. 348, stats., the Department of Transportation, as required by law, will prepare
a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
Passed 7–0 Apr 5, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Holperin, Jauch, Hansen, Taylor and Cowles;Cosponsored by Representatives Clark, Friske, Sherman, Soletski, Mursau, Bies and Townsend
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Mar 10, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 1, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0 by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Tourism, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 5, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Department of Transportation Vehicle report received pursuant to s. 13.096, Wisconsin Statutes
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Laid on the table
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1