Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 579

Designation of a corporation to receive funding for electronic health information exchange, creation of a corporation, and making an appropriation

Topics: Corporation, Federal aid, Health Services, Department of: Health, United States: Health and Human Services, Department of

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the federal Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) regulates the exchange of health information electronically. The HITECH Act allows the secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to award grants to promote the exchange of health information electronically. A state may receive that grant itself or may designate a nonprofit corporation that meets certain criteria to apply for and receive the federal grants under the HITECH Act.

This bill allows the secretary of the Department of Health Services (DHS) to designate a nonprofit corporation as the entity to apply for and receive federal funding under the HITECH Act if the corporation meets all of the following criteria:

Read the full summary

1. A purpose of the corporation, as written in its articles of incorporation or bylaws, is to use information technology to improve health care quality and efficiency through the authorized and secure electronic exchange and use of health information.

2. Annually, the corporation reports to the secretary on statewide health information exchange and how exchange efforts are enabling meaningful use of certified electronic health record technology, as defined in federal law.

3. The corporation complies with the requirements to be a qualified state-designated entity and to receive a grant under the HITECH Act.

4. The corporation's governing structure and bylaws allow it to consult and consider recommendations from outside entities, as specified under the HITECH Act.

5. The board of directors of the corporation includes as members the state health officer, the state Medical Assistance program director, and one person whom the governor selects. The board's members also include, with the goal of balancing public and private health sector interests, at least one individual representing each of the following categories: health care providers, health insurers or health plans, employers who purchase or self-insure employee health care, health care consumers or consumer advocates, and higher education.

6. The corporation agrees to fulfill purposes related to development and maintenance of electronic health information exchange.

DHS may make payments to a corporation to support health information exchange if the secretary of DHS determines that the corporation meets the same conditions as a corporation that is designated as the entity to apply for and receive federal funding under the HITECH Act.

The bill allows the secretary of DHS to organize and maintain a corporation for purposes related to the development and maintenance of electronic health information exchange. If the secretary organizes the corporation, the secretary must appoint as initial members the same categories of individuals as are required for a corporation to be designated to apply for and receive funding under the HITECH Act.

Who's behind it

9 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (16)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Rural Issues vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 25, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 14 to 0 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 20, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 14 to 0.

  3. Apr 8, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  4. Mar 25, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  5. Mar 4, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology.

  8. Mar 2, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Lehman, Risser, Lassa, Taylor, Plale, Darling and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Richards, Dexter, Pasch, Berceau, Turner, Molepske Jr., Vruwink, Suder, Seidel, Benedict, Grigsby, Shilling, Pocan, Stone, Rhoades and Hilgenberg

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology

  3. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 25, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Mar 25, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  13. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  14. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote