Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
designation of a corporation to receive funding for electronic health information exchange, creation of a corporation, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the federal Health Information Technology for Economic
and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) regulates the exchange of health information
electronically. The HITECH Act allows the secretary of the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services to award grants to promote the exchange of health
information electronically. A state may receive that grant itself or may designate a
nonprofit corporation that meets certain criteria to apply for and receive the federal
grants under the HITECH Act.
This bill allows the secretary of the Department of Health Services (DHS) to
designate a nonprofit corporation as the entity to apply for and receive federal
funding under the HITECH Act if the corporation meets all of the following criteria:
1. A purpose of the corporation, as written in its articles of incorporation or
bylaws, is to use information technology to improve health care quality and efficiency
through the authorized and secure electronic exchange and use of health
information.
2. Annually, the corporation reports to the secretary on statewide health
information exchange and how exchange efforts are enabling meaningful use of
certified electronic health record technology, as defined in federal law.
3. The corporation complies with the requirements to be a qualified
state-designated entity and to receive a grant under the HITECH Act.
4. The corporation's governing structure and bylaws allow it to consult and
consider recommendations from outside entities, as specified under the HITECH
Act.
5. The board of directors of the corporation includes as members the state
health officer, the state Medical Assistance program director, and one person whom
the governor selects. The board's members also include, with the goal of balancing
public and private health sector interests, at least one individual representing each
of the following categories: health care providers, health insurers or health plans,
employers who purchase or self-insure employee health care, health care consumers
or consumer advocates, and higher education.
6. The corporation agrees to fulfill purposes related to development and
maintenance of electronic health information exchange.
DHS may make payments to a corporation to support health information
exchange if the secretary of DHS determines that the corporation meets the same
conditions as a corporation that is designated as the entity to apply for and receive
federal funding under the HITECH Act.
The bill allows the secretary of DHS to organize and maintain a corporation for
purposes related to the development and maintenance of electronic health
information exchange. If the secretary organizes the corporation, the secretary must
appoint as initial members the same categories of individuals as are required for a
corporation to be designated to apply for and receive funding under the HITECH Act.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 25, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
Passed 14–0 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kreitlow, Vinehout, Lehman, Risser, Lassa, Taylor, Plale, Darling and Wirch;Cosponsored by Representatives Richards, Dexter, Pasch, Berceau, Turner, Molepske Jr., Vruwink, Suder, Seidel, Benedict, Grigsby, Shilling, Pocan, Stone, Rhoades and Hilgenberg
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 25, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Issues, Biofuels, and Information Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 25, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)
- Apr 19, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 0
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 22, 2010 · Senate
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1