Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
public, educational, and governmental access channel requirements for video service providers and interim cable operators.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, with certain exceptions, a person may not provide video
service unless the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) has issued a video
service franchise to the person. The prohibition was enacted as part of
2007
Wisconsin Act 42
, which made substantial changes to the regulation of cable
television service. Current law defines "video service," in general, as cable television
service, and other service comparable to programming service provided by a
television broadcast station, that is provided through facilities located, at least in
part, in public rights-of-way. Current law refers to a person who is granted a video
service franchise as a "video service provider." One of the exceptions to the
prohibition applies to a person operating under a cable television franchise granted
by a municipality before the enactment of
2007 Wisconsin Act 42
. Current law allows
such a person to elect to continue to provide cable television service until the
franchise expires. Upon expiration of the municipally granted franchise, the person
must apply to DFI for a video service franchise. Current law refers to a person who
elects to operate under a municipally granted cable television franchise until the
franchise's expiration as an "interim cable operator."
Current law prohibits municipalities from requiring video service providers
and interim cable operators to provide monetary support for access facilities for
public, educational, and governmental access channels (PEG channels) after
January 1, 2011. The amount of monetary support that a municipality may require
before that date is generally based on the amount of support that a municipality
required prior to the enactment of
2007 Wisconsin Act 42
. This bill changes current
law so that it refers to support for PEG channels, rather than to monetary support
for access facilities for PEG channels. The bill also allows a municipality to require,
beginning on January 1, 2011, video service providers and interim cable operators
to pay a fee for the purpose of supporting PEG channels. The fee, which must be set
by ordinance, may be equal to no more than 1 percent of a video service provider's
or interim cable operator's annual gross receipts. The bill also makes video service
providers and interim cable operators responsible for making any changes to PEG
channel content or programming that are necessary for compatibility with their
service delivery technology or protocol. Under current law, municipalities that
provide PEG channel programming are responsible for such changes.
The bill also requires video service providers and interim cable operators to
provide channel capacity for PEG channels with accessibility, functionality, and
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Robson (D) , Vinehout (D)
19 cosponsors
A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Black (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Hebl (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hintz (D) , Hubler (D) , Kessler (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Roys (D) , Schneider (D) , Sherman , Sinicki (D) , Smith (D) , Van Akkeren (D) , Vruwink (D)
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Apr 12, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vinehout, Robson, Miller and Risser;Cosponsored by Representatives Hebl, Smith, Berceau, Molepske Jr., Kessler, Pope-Roberts, Schneider, Black, Garthwaite, Van Akkeren, Hilgenberg, Sherman, Bies, Roys, Hintz, Vruwink, A. Williams, Sinicki and Hubler
- Mar 2, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 6, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 12, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Apr 12, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1