Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 585

Prohibiting discrimination against an employee who declines to attend an employer-sponsored meeting or to participate in any communication with the employer or with an agent, representative, or designee of the employer, the primary purpose of which is to communicate the opinion of the employer about religious or political matters

Topics: Discrimination in employment, Political parties, Religious societies

Became law

The governor signed it on May 12, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 52 to 45

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 290

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2010: “Published 5-26-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of age, race, creed, color, disability, marital status, sex, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, arrest record, conviction record, military service, or use or nonuse of a lawful product off the employer's premises during nonworking hours.

This bill prohibits discrimination against an employee who declines to attend an employer-sponsored meeting or to participate in any communication with the employer or with an agent, representative, or designee of the employer, the primary purpose of which is to communicate opinions about religious or political matters.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, discrimination on that basis includes discharging or otherwise discriminating against an employee because the employee declines to attend such a meeting or to participate in such a communication or threatening to discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee as a means of requiring the employee to attend such a meeting or participate in such a communication.

The bill provides, however, that it is not employment discrimination on that basis for an employer to refuse to hire or employ an individual, to suspend or terminate the employment of an individual, or to discriminate against an individual in promotion, in compensation, or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because the individual declines to attend such a meeting or to participate in such a communication if any of the following applies:

1. The employer is a religious association not organized for private profit or an organization or corporation that is primarily owned or controlled by such a religious association and the primary purpose of the meeting or communication is to communicate the employer's religious beliefs, tenets, or practices.

2. The employer is a political organization, including a political party or any other organization that engages, in substantial part, in political activities, and the primary purpose of the meeting or communication is to communicate the employer's political tenets or purposes.

3. The primary purpose of the meeting or communication is to communicate information about religious matters or political matters that the employer is required by law to communicate and no information is communicated about those matters beyond what is legally required.

In addition, the bill does not limit any of the following:

1. The application of the law restricting political solicitation of public officers and employees while engaged in official duties or while on state property.

2. The right of an employer's executive, managerial, or administrative personnel to discuss issues relating to the operation of the employer's program, business, or enterprise, including issues arising under the bill.

3. The right of an employer to offer meetings or other communications about religious matters or political matters for which attendance or participation is strictly voluntary.

For purposes of the bill: 1) "religious matters" means religious affiliation or the decision to join or not to join, or to support or not to support, any bona fide religious association; 2) "political matters" means political party affiliation, a political campaign, an attempt to influence legislation, or the decision to join or not to join, or to support or not to support, any lawful political group, constituent group, or political or constituent group activity; and 3) "constituent group" includes a civic association, community group, social club, fraternal society, mutual benefit alliance, or labor organization.

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. All 6 are Democrats.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Apr 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 52 to 45 · Apr 22, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 52, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 12, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 290.

  3. May 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 22, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too, 52 to 45.

  5. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 16, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Apr 15, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Apr 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  9. Mar 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Mar 22, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Mar 16, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Mar 5, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  14. Mar 2, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Coggs, Hansen, Lassa, Kreitlow, Wirch and Taylor;Cosponsored by Representatives Van Akkeren, Sinicki, Milroy, Berceau, Black, Pope-Roberts, Pasch, Young, Pocan, Turner and Grigsby

  2. Mar 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  3. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 22, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  9. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:52 A.M. on 4-22-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 26

  19. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 52, Noes 45

  23. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Apr 26, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-26-2010

  26. May 11, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-11-2010

  27. May 12, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-12-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 290

  28. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Published 5-26-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote