Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

SB 601

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

comprehensive planning.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a

city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission (local governmental unit)

creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an

existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. A

town may create a comprehensive plan only if it exercises village powers as

authorized by the town meeting. The required planning elements include the

following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural,

natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and

intergovernmental cooperation.

Also under current law, beginning on January 1, 2010, certain actions of a local

governmental unit that affect land use must be consistent with that local

governmental unit's comprehensive plan. The actions to which this requirement

applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances,

including zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. Also under current law,

beginning on January 1, 2010, if a local governmental unit engages in any of these

specified actions, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required

planning elements.

This bill specifies that the actions of a local governmental unit that must be

consistent with the local governmental unit's comprehensive plan are ordinances

related to official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning, including

zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. "Consistent with" is defined in this

bill to mean "furthers or does not contradict the objectives, goals, and policies

contained in the comprehensive plan." This bill also specifies that enacting a

comprehensive plan by ordinance does not make the comprehensive plan by itself a

regulation.

Also under this bill, if a local governmental unit has not adopted a

comprehensive plan, it may be exempt from the consistency requirement if either:

1) the local governmental unit has not received a comprehensive planning grant from

the Department of Administration (DOA), and the local governmental unit adopts

a resolution stating that it will adopt a comprehensive plan by January 1, 2012; or

2) the local governmental unit has received a comprehensive planning grant and an

extension from DOA. The local governmental unit is exempt from the consistency

requirement until January 1, 2012, if it qualifies under the former provision or until

the expiration of the extension granted by DOA if it qualifies under the latter

provision.

Also under this bill, a town may adopt a comprehensive plan whether or not it

exercises village powers.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Harsdorf (R) , Kreitlow (D)

2 cosponsors

Brooks (R) , Hubler (D)

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 7, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Kreitlow and Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Hubler and Brooks

  2. Mar 9, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  3. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  10. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 12:07 P.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. May 6, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 5-6-2010

  24. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  25. May 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 372

  26. May 20, 2010 · Senate

    Published 6-1-2010