Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
comprehensive planning.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under the current law commonly known as the "Smart Growth" statute, if a
city, village, town, county, or regional planning commission (local governmental unit)
creates a development plan or master plan (comprehensive plan) or amends an
existing comprehensive plan, the plan must contain certain planning elements. A
town may create a comprehensive plan only if it exercises village powers as
authorized by the town meeting. The required planning elements include the
following: housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agricultural,
natural, and cultural resources; economic development; land use; and
intergovernmental cooperation.
Also under current law, beginning on January 1, 2010, certain actions of a local
governmental unit that affect land use must be consistent with that local
governmental unit's comprehensive plan. The actions to which this requirement
applies are official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning ordinances,
including zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. Also under current law,
beginning on January 1, 2010, if a local governmental unit engages in any of these
specified actions, the comprehensive plan must contain at least all of the required
planning elements.
This bill specifies that the actions of a local governmental unit that must be
consistent with the local governmental unit's comprehensive plan are ordinances
related to official mapping, local subdivision regulation, and zoning, including
zoning of shorelands or wetlands in shorelands. "Consistent with" is defined in this
bill to mean "furthers or does not contradict the objectives, goals, and policies
contained in the comprehensive plan." This bill also specifies that enacting a
comprehensive plan by ordinance does not make the comprehensive plan by itself a
regulation.
Also under this bill, if a local governmental unit has not adopted a
comprehensive plan, it may be exempt from the consistency requirement if either:
1) the local governmental unit has not received a comprehensive planning grant from
the Department of Administration (DOA), and the local governmental unit adopts
a resolution stating that it will adopt a comprehensive plan by January 1, 2012; or
2) the local governmental unit has received a comprehensive planning grant and an
extension from DOA. The local governmental unit is exempt from the consistency
requirement until January 1, 2012, if it qualifies under the former provision or until
the expiration of the extension granted by DOA if it qualifies under the latter
provision.
Also under this bill, a town may adopt a comprehensive plan whether or not it
exercises village powers.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Apr 7, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 9, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kreitlow and Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Hubler and Brooks
- Mar 9, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 6, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report passage recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:07 P.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- May 6, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 5-6-2010
- May 13, 2010 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010
- May 18, 2010 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 372
- May 20, 2010 · Senate
Published 6-1-2010