Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 626

Modifications to platting requirements

Topics: Municipality: Ordinance, Plats, Register of deeds

Became law

The governor signed it on May 18, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 17, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 376

Latest entry in the official record, May 20, 2010: “Published 6-1-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county, town, city, or village (approving authority) has the right to approve or object to a plat (the map of a subdivision). Generally, the location of the subdivision determines which approving authority or authorities have the right to approve the plat. Approval of a plat is conditioned, among other things, on the plat's compliance with the local ordinances and comprehensive, master, or development plan of the approving authority or authorities that have the right to approve the plat.

This bill specifies that the local ordinances with which a plat must comply are those in effect when the preliminary plat is submitted, or when the final plat is submitted if a preliminary plat is not. The bill allows an approving authority and a subdivider to agree to waive or vary requirements under an ordinance that is in effect when the preliminary plat, or final plat if no preliminary plat, is submitted and to agree as to the application of ordinances that are enacted by the approving authority after the preliminary plat, or final plat if no preliminary plat, is submitted.

Read the full summary

Current law allows an approving authority to enact ordinances governing the subdivision of land that are more restrictive than the provisions in the statutes. The bill provides that local ordinances may not be enacted that are more restrictive than the provisions in the statutes with respect to time limits, deadlines, notice requirements, or other provisions that provide protections for subdividers.

Current law provides that if a preliminary plat is submitted, an approving authority may refuse to approve the final plat if it is not submitted within 24 months after the last required approval of the preliminary plat. The bill increases the time for submitting the final plat to 36 months after the last required approval of the preliminary plat and provides that any approving authority may extend this time.

Under current law, a subdivider may with the permission of the approving authority submit a final plat that is only the portion of the approved preliminary plat that the subdivider intends to record at that time. The bill provides that a subdivider does not need permission to submit a final plat that is only a portion of the preliminary plat if the preliminary plat identified phases of the development and the portion of the final plat that is being submitted substantially conforms to the preliminary plat.

Current law provides that if a preliminary plat is submitted and approved, the final plat is entitled to approval if it substantially conforms to the preliminary plat.

The bill requires a professional engineer, planner, or other person charged with the responsibility to review plats to provide the approving authority with his or her conclusions as to whether the final plat substantially conforms to the preliminary plat and with his or her recommendation on approval of the final plat.

Under current law, as a condition of approval, an approving authority may require a subdivider to execute a surety bond or provide other security to ensure that certain improvements will be made. The bill provides that the approving authority may not require any security for improvements sooner than is reasonably necessary before the commencement of the installation of the improvements and that, if the project will be constructed in phases, the amount of the security must be limited to the phase of the project that is being constructed.

Current law requires a subdivider to record the final plat in the office of the register of deeds in the county where the subdivision is located. The register of deeds may not accept the final plat for recording unless it is offered for recording within six months after the last approval and within 24 months after the first approval. The bill specifically provides that a subdivider may record the final plat in separate parts at different times. In addition, the bill extends the times for recording to within 12 months after the last approval and within 36 months after the first approval.

Who's behind it

3 senators are its ⁠. 2 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (8)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 20, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. May 18, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 376.

  3. May 13, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it too.

  5. Apr 20, 2010

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Apr 20, 2010

    The Senate passed it.

  8. Apr 20, 2010

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Apr 15, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  10. Apr 15, 2010

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  11. Apr 15, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 6, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Mar 17, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.

  14. Mar 17, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Hansen, Kreitlow and Cowles;Cosponsored by Representatives Molepske Jr., Zigmunt, Berceau, Suder, Soletski, Roth, Huebsch and Hintz

  2. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  3. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Apr 12, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Hansen

  5. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read

  19. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  26. Apr 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 4-27-2010

  27. May 13, 2010 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 5-13-2010

  28. May 18, 2010 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-18-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 376

  29. May 20, 2010 · Senate

    Published 6-1-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote