Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
physical examinations and discovery of patients' records in civil actions.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes changes to the scope of, and procedure for, discovery in civil
cases where the mental or physical condition of a party is in issue. Under current
law, if a claimant raises an issue involving his or her mental or physical condition,
the court may, upon a motion and notice from the defending party, order the claimant
to undergo a physical, mental, or vocational examination. Under current law, the
court order specifies the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the
examination.
Current law requires the court to order a claimant who seeks damages for
personal injuries to give the defending party, and any physician named in the order,
permission to inspect the claimant's X-rays and hospital or medical records and
reports, unless the X-rays, records, or reports are beyond the scope of general
discovery in the case. Under current law, the defending party must give a copy of any
report he or she receives from the person who conducted the examination of the
claimant or the inspection of the claimant's X-rays, records, or reports to the
claimant. If the defending party does not give a copy of the report to the claimant
within ten days after he or she receives it, the defending party may not introduce at
trial any evidence that the defending party obtained from the examination or
inspection.
Under this bill, if a claimant raises an issue involving his or her mental or
physical condition, the court may order the claimant to undergo one physical,
mental, or vocational examination, unless the defending party shows good cause for
the claimant to undergo more than one examination. Under the bill, the order for
the examination must do all of the following: 1) specify the time, place, manner,
conditions, and scope of the examination, and identify who will conduct the
examination; 2) prohibit the person who is conducting the examination from
inquiring into any issue relating to liability in the underlying action; 3) allow the
claimant to record the examination electronically and have one or more witnesses
present at the examination; 4) require the examination to be conducted within 100
miles of where the claimant lives, is employed, or transacts business, 5) require the
defending party to pay the claimant's expenses relating to the examination,
including travel expenses, child care expenses, and a minimum of $30 per hour.
Under the bill, if a claimant seeks damages for personal injuries, a court may
order the claimant to give the defending party, and any physician named in the order,
permission to inspect any X-rays or hospital or medical records and reports that
were taken in the course of diagnosing or treating the injuries for which the claimant
seeks damages. If the defending party seeks additional discovery, the bill requires
the defending party to prove, by clear, satisfactory, and convincing evidence to a
reasonable certainty, that the additional discovery is essential to the defense relating
to the cause of the claimant's injuries and that the discovery relates to a pre-existing
condition that is at least substantially similar to the injuries for which the claimant
Sponsors
Introduced by: Sullivan (D)
6 cosponsors
A. Williams (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Soletski (D) , Turner (D)
Full history
- Mar 18, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Sullivan;Cosponsored by Representatives Richards, Pasch, Turner, Soletski, Pope-Roberts and A. Williams
- Mar 18, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1