Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 635

Duties of physicians and of the Medical Examining Board and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Medical Examining Board, Physician

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 23, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law authorizes the Medical Examining Board (board) in the Department of Regulation and Licensing to issue licenses to practice medicine and surgery, to practice perfusion, and to practice as a physician assistant, and to certify respiratory care practitioners. This bill makes several changes to the laws regulating persons licensed, permitted, or certified by the board.

Order of summary suspension Currently, the board may summarily suspend a license, certificate, or other limited permit (credential) granted by the board if the board has probable cause to believe that the credential holder has violated the law and that suspending the credential is necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare. The board may suspend the credential for no more than 30 days pending hearing, but may extend the suspension for an additional 30 days while the hearing is in progress and, if the credential holder has caused a delay in the hearing process, from the time the hearing is commenced until a final decision is issued. In addition, the board may designate any of the officers of the board to suspend a credential for a period of up to 72 hours.

Read the full summary

This bill provides that the board chair and two board members designated by the chair or, if the board chair is unavailable, the board vice-chair and two board members designated by the vice-chair, may exercise the authority to summarily suspend a credential. The bill requires an order of summary suspension to be served on the credential holder in the manner established for service of process. The bill eliminates both the 30-day and 72-hour limitations imposed under current law on a summary suspension. Instead, under the bill, the order of summary suspension remains in effect until the effective date of a final decision and order granted in a disciplinary hearing against the credential holder or until the order of summary suspension is discontinued by the board following a hearing to show cause.

The bill requires the board to issue a notice of hearing commencing a disciplinary proceeding against the credential holder no more than ten days after the order of summary suspension has been issued. The bill also requires the board to notify the credential holder that he or she may request a hearing to show cause. If a hearing to show cause is requested, the board must schedule the hearing on a date within 20 days of the board's receipt of the request.

Duty to report This bill requires a person licensed by the board as a physician to promptly submit a written report to the board when the person has reason to believe any of the following about another physician licensed by the board:

1. The other physician is engaged in acts that constitute a pattern of unprofessional conduct.

2. The other physician is engaged in an act that creates an immediate or continuing danger to one or more patients or to the public.

3. The other physician is or may be medically incompetent.

4. The other physician is or may be mentally or physically unable to engage in the practice of medicine or surgery.

The bill provides that a physician who complies in good faith with the duty to report may not be held civilly or criminally liable or be found guilty of unprofessional conduct.

Definition of "unprofessional conduct" Current law governing persons regulated by the board defines "unprofessional conduct" as those acts or attempted acts of commission or omission defined as unprofessional conduct by the board by rule and any act by a physician or physician assistant in violation of the law governing the prescriptive authority of the physician or physician assistant. This bill modifies the definition of "unprofessional conduct" to include failure on the part of a physician to comply with the duty to report as required under the bill.

Biennial training requirement Current law requires each person licensed or certified by the board to, by November 1 of each odd-numbered year, register with the board. As a condition of registration, each physician must submit proof of attendance at and completion within the preceding two calendar years of continuing education programs or courses of study approved by the board. The board may waive the requirement if it finds that exceptional circumstances have prevented the physician from meeting the requirement.

This bill requires a physician to complete professional development and maintenance of certification or performance improvement or continuing medical education programs or courses of study required by the board by rule, and to include proof of attendance at and completion of these additional programs or courses of study in the biennial application for registration with the board. The board may waive this new requirement if it finds that exceptional circumstances have prevented the physician from meeting the requirement.

Temporary educational permit to practice medicine and surgery Currently, the board may grant a temporary educational permit (TEP) to practice medicine and surgery to a person who has graduated and possesses a diploma from a medical or osteopathic college approved by the board and has completed postgraduate training of 12 months in a facility approved by the board.

The board may also grant a TEP to a graduate of a foreign medical school which has not been approved by the board if the graduate of a foreign medical school has had postgraduate training in this country in a 12-month program approved by the board or has had other professional experience suitable to the board, has passed the examinations given by the educational council for foreign medical graduates or its successors, and meets other conditions established by the board.

A person who holds a TEP may take postgraduate educational training in a facility approved by the board, perform services under the direction of a person licensed to practice medicine and surgery, and prescribe drugs other than narcotics.

This bill eliminates the prohibition on prescribing narcotics for a person holding a TEP.

Who's behind it

2 lawmakers are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat. 1 has no party on record.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 3 names

Authors (2)

  • Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
  • by request of The Medical Examining Board

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Apr 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 21, 2010

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)

  3. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  4. Apr 19, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  5. Apr 14, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Mar 31, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Mar 23, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  8. Mar 23, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Risser, by request of The Medical Examining Board;Cosponsored by Representative Richards

  2. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Mar 31, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Apr 19, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  9. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  10. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-22-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Apr 22, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote