Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 66

Operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant and providing a penalty

Topics: Court, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals: Felony, Drunken driving, Extraordinary session, 2009: December, Fines, Forfeiture, Implied consent or alcohol concentration, Judicial Council, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Motor vehicle: Driver's license, Motor vehicle: Equipment, Parole or probation, Sentences and penalties, Winnebago County, Wisconsin Works

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 22, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 18, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Dec 16, 2009

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 100

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 29, 2009: “Published 12-23-2009.”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes to the laws related to the operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), including the following:

1. Current law gives a court discretion to require the installation of an ignition interlock device on a person's motor vehicle if the person committed an OWI offense and has one or more prior convictions, suspensions, or revocations for OWI. Under current law, if the person has two convictions, suspensions, or revocations for OWI within any five-year period, the court is required to order the installation of an ignition interlock device on a person's motor vehicle. This bill requires the court to order the installation of a ignition interlock device on a person's motor vehicle if the person has a third conviction, suspension, or revocation for OWI within any period;

Read the full summary

or if the person has a second conviction, suspension, or revocation for OWI within any period and had an alcohol concentration of 0.16 or greater at the time of the current offense.

2. The bill requires the court, if it orders the installation of an ignition interlock device, to determine the income of the violator, and if the violator's income is less than the income limit for the Wisconsin Works program to reduce the amount of the fine imposed by the amount necessary to pay for the installation and maintenance of the ignition interlock device.

3. The bill prohibits the company that equips a motor vehicle with an ignition interlock device from removing the device or terminating the contract for the maintenance of the device during the period that the court ordered without first receiving the court's permission.

4. The bill increases the penalties for OWI as follows:

a. The penalty for a third OWI offense is currently a fine of $600 to $2,000 and imprisonment of 30 days to one year in jail. Under the bill if the person has a third OWI-related conviction, suspension, or revocation within a five-year period, the current offense is a Class I felony and creates a minimum fine of $600 and a minimum imprisonment of 60 days.

b. The penalty for a fourth OWI offense is currently a fine of $600 to $2,000 and imprisonment of 60 days to one year in jail. The bill makes the fourth OWI offense a Class I felony and creates a minimum fine of $600 and a minimum imprisonment of 60 days.

5.

2005 Wisconsin Act 389 created a pilot program for sentencing persons in Winnebago County who are convicted of certain second or third offenses involving OWI. Under that act, the period of imprisonment for an OWI offense in Winnebago County may be reduced if the violator successfully completes a period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment. A person may complete a treatment program and receive a reduced period of imprisonment only once. This bill expands the sentencing option to any county that opts to allow a violator to successfully complete a period of probation that includes alcohol and other drug treatment in exchange for a shorter period of imprisonment.

6. Currently, a person who commits his or her first OWI offense and who has a prohibited alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.99 at the time of the offense is not liable for penalty surcharges or court fees and does not need to comply with an alcohol or other drug assessment program. Further, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must purge its records of a first OWI offense after ten years;

DOT keeps all other records of OWI offenses permanently.

Under this bill, a person who commits his or her first OWI offense and who has a prohibited alcohol concentration between 0.08 and 0.99 at the time of the violation is liable for the surcharges or fees and must comply with an alcohol or other drug assessment program before his or her driving privileges may be reinstated. Under this bill, DOT must keep a record of this offense permanently.

The bill requires the Judicial Council to establish advisory sentencing guidelines for OWI offenses and make those guidelines and any revisions available to judges and attorneys at least annually.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

13 senators are its ⁠. 9 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 7, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 12, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 30, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 93 to 1 · Dec 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 93, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 33 to 0 · Dec 16, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 29, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 22, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 100.

  3. Dec 21, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Dec 16, 2009

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Dec 16, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Dec 16, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too, 93 to 1.

  7. Dec 16, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Dec 15, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Nov 10, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate passed it, 32 to 0.

  11. Nov 5, 2009

    The Senate adopted it.

  12. Nov 5, 2009

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received” (the official wording)

  13. Oct 30, 2009

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  14. Oct 12, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  15. Oct 7, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  16. Oct 7, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  17. Oct 7, 2009

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  18. Sep 9, 2009

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  19. Jun 24, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Jun 16, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. Jun 4, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  22. Apr 20, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  23. Apr 7, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  24. Mar 11, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  25. Mar 6, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  26. Feb 18, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  27. Feb 18, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 18, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Sullivan, Plale, Lehman, Decker, Hansen, Vinehout, Harsdorf, Risser, Carpenter, A. Lasee, Darling, Erpenbach and Cowles;Cosponsored by Representatives Zepnick, Lothian, A. Ott, Bies and Honadel

  2. Feb 18, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  3. Mar 6, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 11, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 7, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 20, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jun 4, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Jun 16, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Jun 24, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Sep 9, 2009 · Senate

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes

  11. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senators Sullivan, Taylor and Decker

  12. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 1 offered by Senator Sullivan

  13. Oct 6, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  14. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report introduction and adoption of Senate Amendment 2 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 3, Noes 2 by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  16. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  17. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  18. Oct 7, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Oct 12, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Oct 19, 2009 · Senate

    Representative Lothian withdrawn as a cosponsor

  21. Oct 21, 2009 · Senate

    Representative Honadel withdrawn as a cosponsor

  22. Oct 22, 2009 · Senate

    Representative Bies withdrawn as a cosponsor

  23. Oct 30, 2009 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  24. Oct 30, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Nov 3, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Sullivan

  26. Nov 4, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  27. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received

  28. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 1 laid on table

  30. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator Leibham

  31. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 to Senate substitute amendment 2 laid on table

  32. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 2 offered by Senator S. Fitzgerald

  33. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 to Senate substitute amendment 2 laid on table

  34. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Senate substitute amendment 2 adopted

  35. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  37. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  38. Nov 5, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  39. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  40. Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  41. Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas

  42. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  43. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  44. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  45. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  46. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 93, Noes 1

  47. Dec 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  48. Dec 16, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  49. Dec 16, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  50. Dec 16, 2009 · Senate

    Assembly amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  51. Dec 16, 2009 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  52. Dec 17, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 12-17-2009

  53. Dec 21, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 12-21-2009

  54. Dec 22, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-22-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 100

  55. Dec 29, 2009 · Senate

    Published 12-23-2009.

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote