Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 669

Willful misclassification of an employee as a nonemployee by a person engaged in the painting or drywall finishing of buildings or other structures with intent to evade the laws related to income tax withholding, worker's compensation, unemployment insurance, or employment discrimination and providing a penalty

Topics: Contractor, Discrimination in employment, Income tax, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Trades and occupations, Unemployment insurance, Worker's compensation, Workforce Development, Department of

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 6, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, any employer engaged in the construction of roads, bridges, highways, sewers, water mains, utilities, public buildings, factories, housing, or similar construction projects who misclassifies an employee as a nonemployee willfully and with intent to evade any requirement of the laws relating to income tax withholding, worker's compensation, unemployment insurance, or employment discrimination is subject to a $25,000 fine for each violation. This bill applies that fine to any person engaged in the painting or drywall finishing of buildings or other structures who willfully and with intent to evade any of those laws misclassifies an employee as a nonemployee.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 7 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Apr 20, 2010

    “Placed on the calendar of 4-20-2010 following Assembly Bill 600” (the official wording)

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    “Read a third time” (the official wording)

  5. Apr 20, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  6. Apr 16, 2010

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)” (the official wording)

  7. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Apr 16, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Apr 15, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  10. Apr 14, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Apr 14, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Apr 6, 2010 to Apr 9, 2010

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  13. Apr 6, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.

  14. Apr 6, 2010

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Risser and Lassa;Cosponsored by Representatives Pocan and Sinicki

  2. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  3. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Sullivan added as a coauthor

  4. Apr 9, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Wirch added as a coauthor

  5. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  12. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e)

  13. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a coauthor

  15. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  17. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  18. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time

  19. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on the calendar of 4-20-2010 following Assembly Bill 600

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Laid on the table

  21. Apr 23, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  22. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote