Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Senate Bill 7

The filing of certain forms related to tax incremental financing district number ten in the city of Chippewa Falls

Topics: Chippewa Falls, City of, Property tax, Revenue, Department of

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 14, 2009. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 21, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 10, 2009

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 96 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 5

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2009: “Published 4-28-2009”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a city or village may create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory. The project plan of the TID may be amended by resolution of a city's planning commission. Before such an amendment may take effect, however, several procedures are required. These procedures include approval by the common council, review by a joint review board, and a public hearing. Once these procedures are completed, the city clerk must submit the amendment and certain forms to the Department of Revenue (DOR). Upon receipt, DOR is required to recalculate and recertify the tax incremental base of the TID. The amendment and forms must be submitted to DOR on or before December 31 of the year in which the changes to the TID take effect.

This bill specifies that if the clerk of the city of Chippewa Falls submits the necessary forms to DOR on or before December 31, 2009, for a TID, the project plan of which was amended or attempted to be amended on January 1, 2007, based on actions taken by the common council in November 2006, DOR must proceed as if the forms had been timely filed on or before December 31, 2007, except that a value increment may not be certified before 2010.

Who's behind it

Pat Kreitlow, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 4 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Jan 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Ways and Means vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 18, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 96 to 0 · Feb 24, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 96, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 17, 2009

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 14, 2009

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 5.

  3. Apr 9, 2009

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 24, 2009

    The Assembly passed it too, 96 to 0.

  5. Feb 18, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Feb 18, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  7. Feb 17, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Feb 12, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  9. Feb 12, 2009

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Feb 10, 2009

    The Senate passed it.

  11. Feb 5, 2009

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Feb 5, 2009

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Feb 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Jan 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  15. Jan 29, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Jan 21, 2009

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  17. Jan 21, 2009

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 21, 2009 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Kreitlow;Cosponsored by Representatives Dexter, Wood and Suder

  2. Jan 21, 2009 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  3. Jan 29, 2009 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 29, 2009 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 29, 2009 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  6. Jan 29, 2009 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Feb 3, 2009 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Feb 5, 2009 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-10-2009 by committee on Senate Organization

  11. Feb 10, 2009 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Feb 10, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 10, 2009 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 10, 2009 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Feb 10, 2009 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Feb 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  18. Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  19. Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  20. Feb 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  21. Feb 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  22. Feb 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-24-2009 by committee on Rules

  23. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  27. Feb 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Feb 24, 2009 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Feb 27, 2009 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-27-2009

  30. Apr 9, 2009 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-9-2009

  31. Apr 14, 2009 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-14-2009. 2009 Wisconsin Act 5

  32. Apr 17, 2009 · Senate

    Published 4-28-2009

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote