Senate Bill 703
Content of executive budget bills and requiring a supermajority approval for certain bills in the state legislature, preparation of results-based biennial budget requests by executive branch state agencies, and state agency base budget review reports
Topics: Bills, Legislative, Budget bills and process, Governor, Legislature: Procedure, State agencies
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Apr 21, 2010
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Jun 11, 2010: “Fiscal estimate received”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law requires the governor to prepare and submit to the legislature an executive budget bill or bills that contain the governor's recommendations for appropriations in the succeeding fiscal biennium. The governor may submit these appropriation recommendations in a single bill or in a multitude of bills. In recent history, the practice has been for the governor to submit a single executive budget bill. This bill requires the governor to prepare and submit to the legislature multiple executive budget bills. Each bill may contain only the governor's recommendations for appropriations for the succeeding biennium from a single fund. In other words, an executive budget bill may not appropriate moneys from more than one fund.
The bill also creates a legislative rule of proceeding that provides that no house of the legislature may pass a bill that transfers money from one fund to another fund unless the bill is approved by two-thirds of those members present and voting.
Read the full summary Show less
Current law requires each executive branch state agency to submit its biennial budget request to the Department of Administrative and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau no later than September 15 of the even-numbered year. These requests are used for the purpose of preparing the executive budget bill. This bill provides that each executive branch state agency must submit its biennial budget requests prepared using the principles of results-based budgeting for each of its activities, units, and programs. Under the bill, "results-based budgeting" is defined as the compilation of a budget of a state agency in which objectives are established for each of the state agency's activities, units, and programs; in which resources are allocated specifically to achieving the objectives; in which objective performance indicators are developed to determine whether the state agency has achieved the objectives; and in which an evaluation is undertaken to determine whether the objectives have been achieved using the performance indicators.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 , the biennial budget act, eliminated a program that required, every fiscal biennium, one-third of all state agencies to prepare a base budget review report that contains a description of each programmatic activity of the state agency; an accounting of all expenditures in each of the prior three fiscal years, arranged by revenue source and expenditure category for that state agency; and, for each programmatic activity of the state agency, an accounting of all expenditures, arranged by revenue source and expenditure category in the last two quarters in each of the prior three fiscal years. This bill recreates the requirement for state agencies to prepare base budget review reports.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 7 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Dan Kapanke · Republican, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (4)
- Brett Davis · Republican, Assembly
- Don Pridemore · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Jun 11, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 21, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.
-
Apr 21, 2010
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kapanke, Leibham and Schultz;Cosponsored by Representatives Vos, Davis, Pridemore and Strachota
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Jun 11, 2010 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate