Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
veto power of county executive over appropriations (first consideration).
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Adopted, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The constitution grants the chief executive of a county the power to approve
appropriations contained in resolutions or ordinances in whole or part. This
executive power is similar to that granted the governor with respect to
appropriations bills. In fact, in 1984, the attorney general opined that the county
executive's veto power over appropriations "is not dissimilar to that of the Governor"
(OAG 27-84). This proposed constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2009
legislature on first consideration, provides that, in approving an appropriation in
part, the county executive may not create a new word by rejecting individual letters
in the words of the resolution or ordinance and may not create a new sentence by
combining parts of two or more sentences of the resolution or ordinance. These are
the identical restrictions that are currently placed on the governor in the exercise of
his or her veto power over appropriations bills.
A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive
legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Lehman (D)
5 cosponsors
Lothian (R) , Pasch (D) , Townsend (R) , Van Akkeren (D) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Jun 3, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 32, Noes 0
Passed 32–0 Sep 15, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report concurrence recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Jan 12, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 97, Noes 1
Passed 97–1 Jan 26, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 5, 2009 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Carpenter, Lehman and Harsdorf;Cosponsored by Representatives Pasch, Van Akkeren, Lothian and Townsend
- Feb 5, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Apr 29, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jun 3, 2009 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jun 3, 2009 · Senate
Report adoption recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Jun 3, 2009 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Sep 8, 2009 · Senate
Placed on calendar 9-15-2009 by committee on Senate Organization
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 32, Noes 0
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Read a second time
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Sep 15, 2009 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security
- Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-26-2010 by committee on Rules
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Representative Ziegelbauer added as a cosponsor
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 97, Noes 1
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jan 29, 2010 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled on 1-29-2010
- Feb 8, 2010 · Senate
Deposited in the office of the Secretary of State on 2-8-2010.
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Published 2-22-2010, 8-3-2010, 9-7-2010, 10-5-2010. Enrolled Joint Resolution 27