Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
evidentiary recordings of persons under the age of 18 engaging in sexually explicit conduct and certain sex offenses against children and providing penalties.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a district attorney must disclose to the defense, and permit
the defense to inspect, copy, or photograph, any physical evidence that the district
attorney intends to use as evidence against that defendant in a trial. Under this bill,
if the evidence is a recording of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct, the
defense may inspect the recording only in a location maintained by the court or a law
enforcement agency, one of which must, under this bill, retain possession, custody,
and control of the recording and must provide the defense opportunity to examine,
inspect, and view the recording. The defense may receive a copy for limited purposes
only if a court finds that the defense has not had opportunity to examine, inspect, or
view the recording.
Under current law, a person who causes a person under the age of 18 to view
or listen to sexually explicit conduct is guilty of a felony if the viewing or listening
is for sexual arousal or gratification of the actor or for humiliating or degrading the
person under the age of 18. Also under current law, a person who communicates via
a computer with an individual whom the person believes is under 16 years old with
the intent to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact with an individual under 16
years old is guilty of a felony. This bill makes the attempt to do either of these crimes
a felony punishable as the completed crime would currently be punishable.
Under current law, the crime of causing a child to view or to listen to sexual
activity, requires that the victim be under the age of 18. Under this bill, the victim
may either be under 18 or be an individual who the person perpetrating the crime
believes or has reason to believe is under 18.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Brooks (R) , Jorgensen (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Ziegelbauer (I)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 7, Noes 2
Passed 7–2 Sep 13, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 10
Passed 86–10 Oct 20, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 88, Noes 7, Paired 2
Passed 88–7 Oct 20, 2011 official source full pageAye · 88
- Alvin Ott (3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (70)
- André Jacque (1)
- Andy Jorgensen (43)
- Bill Kramer (97)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (25)
- Brett Hulsey (78)
- Chris Danou (92)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Christine Sinicki (20)
- Cory Mason (66)
- Dale Kooyenga (5)
- Dan Knodl (24)
- Dan Meyer (34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (59)
- David Craig (28)
- David Cullen (13)
- Dean Kaufert (53)
- Dean Knudson (30)
- Don Pridemore (22)
- Donna Seidel (85)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Edward Brooks (50)
- Elizabeth Coggs (10)
- Erik Severson (28)
- Evan Wynn (43)
- Fred Clark (81)
- Garey Bies (1)
- Gary Tauchen (6)
- Gordon Hintz (54)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (39)
- Jeff Mursau (36)
- Jeffrey Stone (82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (52)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- Jim Ott (23)
- Jim Steineke (5)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (8)
- Joan Ballweg (14)
- Joe Knilans (44)
- Joel Kleefisch (38)
- John Klenke (88)
- John Murtha (29)
- John Nygren (89)
- John Steinbrink (65)
- Jon Richards (19)
- Josh Zepnick (9)
- Karl Van Roy (90)
- Kathleen Bernier (23)
- Keith Ripp (42)
- Kevin Petersen (57)
- Lee Nerison (96)
- Leon Young (16)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (71)
- Margaret Krusick (7)
- Mark Honadel (21)
- Mark Radcliffe (92)
- Mary Williams (87)
- Michelle Litjens (56)
- Mike Endsley (26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (84)
- Pat Strachota (58)
- Paul F. Farrow (33)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (57)
- Peter Barca (64)
- Richard Spanbauer (53)
- Robert Turner (61)
- Robin Vos (33)
- Roger Rivard (75)
- Samantha Kerkman (61)
- Sandy Pasch (10)
- Scott Krug (72)
- Scott Suder (69)
- Sondy Pope (80)
- Steve Doyle (94)
- Steve Kestell (27)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Tamara Grigsby (18)
- Thomas Larson (67)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Tony Staskunas (15)
- Travis Tranel (49)
- Tyler August (31)
- Warren Petryk (93)
Nay · 7
- Chris Taylor (76)
- Frederick Kessler (12)
- Gary Hebl (46)
- Kelda Roys (26)
- Mark Pocan (78)
- Nick Milroy (73)
- Terese Berceau (77)
Not voting · 1
- Jason Fields (11)
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Feb 2, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 22, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Bernard Schaber, Ziegelbauer, Brooks, Jorgensen, Spanbauer and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa and Darling
- Apr 22, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections
- May 3, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 4, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 5, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Jacque added as a coauthor
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Aug 15, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler and Turner
- Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 7, Noes 2
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-20-2011 by committee on Rules
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Turner withdrawn as a coauthor to Assembly amendment 1
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 86, Noes 10
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 88, Noes 7, Paired 2
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 21, 2011 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 21, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations
- Dec 20, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 1, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Feb 2, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended and taken up
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 14, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 14, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 19, 2012 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 13, 2012 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-12-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 284
- Apr 17, 2012 · Assembly
Published 4-26-2012