Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 109

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

eliminating substitution of judges in criminal matters.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, there are two methods by which a judge who is scheduled

to handle a case is replaced: disqualification and substitution. A judge is required

to disqualify himself or herself in a case if the judge may be considered to have an

interest in the matter, such as if the judge is related to a party, has previously been

involved with the case as counsel, or has a significant financial or personal interest

in the outcome.

Substitution is the method by which parties in the case may have a judge who

is scheduled to handle a case taken off the case without having to give a reason. Each

party in a civil case and the defendant in a criminal case generally have a right to

one substitution, except that additional substitution rights occur in certain cases if

there is a successful appeal or if the judge who handles a preliminary hearing is

assigned to handle the trial.

This bill retains the provisions relating to the disqualification of a judge for both

civil and criminal matters, but eliminates the defendant's right to substitution of a

judge in criminal matters.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bies (R) , Jacque (R) , Knilans (R) , Mursau (R) , Rivard (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Vos (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)

4 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Kedzie (R) , Wanggaard (R) , Zipperer (R)

Full history

  1. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Bies, Knilans, Mursau, Rivard, Spanbauer, Vos and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Kedzie, Darling and Wanggaard

  2. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1