Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 109

Eliminating substitution of judges in criminal matters

Topics: Court: Procedure, Judge

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 26, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, there are two methods by which a judge who is scheduled to handle a case is replaced: disqualification and substitution. A judge is required to disqualify himself or herself in a case if the judge may be considered to have an interest in the matter, such as if the judge is related to a party, has previously been involved with the case as counsel, or has a significant financial or personal interest in the outcome.

Substitution is the method by which parties in the case may have a judge who is scheduled to handle a case taken off the case without having to give a reason. Each party in a civil case and the defendant in a criminal case generally have a right to one substitution, except that additional substitution rights occur in certain cases if there is a successful appeal or if the judge who handles a preliminary hearing is assigned to handle the trial.

Read the full summary

This bill retains the provisions relating to the disqualification of a judge for both civil and criminal matters, but eliminates the defendant's right to substitution of a judge in criminal matters.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 16, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jun 9, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. May 11, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. May 10, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Apr 26, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  7. Apr 26, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Bies, Knilans, Mursau, Rivard, Spanbauer, Vos and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Kedzie, Darling and Wanggaard

  2. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Jacque

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate