Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 110

Creating the Special Needs Scholarship Program for disabled pupils, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation

Topics: Children: Special education, Legislative Audit Bureau, Parochial and private educational institutions, Persons with disabilities, Public Instruction, Department of, Scholarships and loans, School: Attendance, School: Conveyance of pupil

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 6, 2012, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 26, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill establishes a Special Needs Scholarship Program. Under the program, a child with a disability may receive a scholarship to attend a public school located outside the pupil's school district of residence, or a private school, if all of the following conditions are met:

1. The school has notified the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) of its intent to participate in the program and the child has been accepted by the school.

Read the full summary

2. If the school is a private school, it is approved as a private school by DPI or is accredited.

3. An individualized education program (IEP) has been completed for the child.

4. The child attended a public school, or did not attend school in this state, in the previous school year.

Upon receipt of an application for a scholarship, DPI must review the child's IEP and determine the amount of the child's scholarship. The amount is the lesser of the cost to the child's school district of residence, or the cost to the school district or private school that the child wishes to attend, of providing regular instruction, instructional and pupil support services, special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services to the child. If the child is attending for less than a full school term, DPI must prorate the amount of the scholarship.

DPI pays the scholarship directly to the school or school district that the child will attend. The scholarship continues while the child attends a school eligible to participate in the program until he or she graduates from high school or until the end of the school term in which he or she turns 21, whichever comes first.

Under the bill, a pupil attending a private school, or a public school outside the pupil's school district of residence, under the program is counted for state aid purposes by the pupil's school district of residence. However, the state aid paid to that school district is reduced by the total amount of scholarships paid by DPI for pupils who reside in that school district.

Each private school participating in the program must comply with applicable health and safety laws; hold a valid occupancy permit, if required by the municipality; comply with federal law that prohibits discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, or national origin; and conduct criminal background investigations of its employees and exclude from employment any person not permitted to hold a teaching license as the result of an offense any any person who might reasonably be believed to pose a threat to the safety of others.

The private school must also annually submit to DPI a school financial report prepared by a certified public accountant. If the private school expects to receive at least $50,000 in scholarships during a school year, it must either file a surety bond with DPI or provide DPI with information demonstrating that it has the ability to pay an amount equal to the total amount of scholarships that it expects to receive.

The bill provides that if a child attends a private school under the program, his or her school district of residence must provide transportation to and from the school if the school is located at least two miles from the child's residence, the child resides in the private school's attendance area, and the private school is situated within the school district of residence or not more than five miles beyond the boundaries of the school district.

If the child attends a public school under the program, the child's parent is responsible for transporting the child to and from school unless transportation is required in the child's IEP. If the latter applies, the school district that the child attends is responsible for transporting the child. The bill allows a low-income pupil to apply to DPI for reimbursement of transportation costs.

The bill authorizes DPI to bar a school from participating in the program if the school intentionally and substantially misrepresents information required under the bill, routinely fails to comply with financial standards, uses a pupil's scholarship for any purpose other than educational purposes, or fails to refund any scholarship overpayments to the state.

Finally, the bill directs the Legislative Audit Bureau to contract for a study of the program. The results of the study must be reported to the legislature by January 9, 2015.

Who's behind it

31 lawmakers are its ⁠. 29 are Republicans, 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Independent.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 35 names

Authors (31)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 14 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 11 to 0 · Feb 27, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 35 to 62 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Education, Ayes 35, Noes 62”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 13 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 62 to 35 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 35 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 37 · Mar 6, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 62 to 35 · Mar 6, 2012 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 62, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 60 to 35 · Mar 13, 2012 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to return to amendable stage, Ayes 60, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 55 to 39 · Mar 13, 2012 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 95 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (55)

No (39)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  3. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 55 to 39.

  5. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Feb 27, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 27, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 4.

  8. May 19, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. May 3, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Apr 26, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  11. Apr 26, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Litjens, Fields, Wynn, Knudson, Nass, Pridemore, Thiesfeldt, Vos, Kleefisch, LeMahieu, Nygren, Strachota, Bernier, Bies, Brooks, Endsley, Farrow, Honadel, Jacque, Knilans, Kooyenga, Kramer, Krug, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, Mursau, Petryk, Rivard, Severson, Spanbauer, Tiffany and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Vukmir, Moulton, Galloway and Darling

  2. Apr 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. May 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. May 19, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Litjens

  6. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)

  7. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  8. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Education

  10. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  11. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  12. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 4

  13. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Education, Ayes 35, Noes 62

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kessler, Pope-Roberts, Hintz, Toles and Pasch

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 35

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Mason, Pasch, Clark, Bernard Schaber, Molepske Jr and Fields

  21. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  22. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Clark and Fields

  23. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  24. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Mason, Pasch, Bernard Schaber, Molepske Jr and Fields

  25. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  26. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Mason, Pasch, Clark, Bernard Schaber and Molepske Jr

  27. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 35

  28. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Mason, Pasch, Clark, Bernard Schaber and Molepske Jr

  29. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  30. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz, Mason, Pasch, Barca and Clark

  31. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  32. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, Hebl, Danou, Turner, Jorgensen, Seidel, Zamarripa, Hintz and Clark

  33. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  34. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Litjens

  35. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  36. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 12 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Litjens

  37. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 12 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  38. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 13 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Pocan, Kessler, Turner, Seidel, Sinicki, Molepske Jr, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Bewley, Berceau, Pasch, Roys and C. Taylor

  39. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 13 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 37

  40. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  41. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  42. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 62, Noes 35

  43. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:01 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  44. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative Nass withdrawn as a coauthor

  45. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to return to amendable stage, Ayes 60, Noes 35

  46. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 55, Noes 39, Paired 4

  47. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  48. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  49. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  50. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  51. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote