Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the restoration of information from an original birth certificate after adoption.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, at the time a person is adopted the state registrar must
prepare a new birth certificate for the adoptee unless the adoptive parents or the
person being adopted objects. The new birth certificate must contain, among other
information, the names and personal information of the adoptive parents, unless the
court's order of adoption indicates otherwise. When a new certificate is issued, the
original certificate is impounded and may be accessed only by court order, with
permission of the birth parents, or for processing purposes of the state registrar.
This bill allows an adult who has been adopted to petition the court to order the
state registrar to prepare a new birth certificate based on information on the person's
original birth certificate if the person did not have the opportunity, at the time of the
adoption, to request that a new birth certificate not be prepared; any adoptive parent
who is alive and who is named on the person's birth certificate does not object to the
removal of his or her name from the birth certificate; and any birth parent who is
alive and who is named on the person's original birth certificate does not object to the
restoration of the information on the person's original birth certificate. Under the
bill, if the court finds that all of those circumstances apply, the court must grant the
petition. The state registrar must issue a new birth certificate that uses all of the
information from the original birth certificate, if ordered by the court.
A new birth certificate issued under the bill does not affect the legal
relationship between the adoptive parents and the adoptee and does not restore any
legal rights or legal relationship that terminated at the time of adoption.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Feb 20, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Milroy, Stone, Barca, Bernard Schaber, Bewley, Brooks, D. Cullen, Danou, Jorgensen, Kessler, LeMahieu, Pasch, Ripp, Shilling, Seidel, Sinicki, Turner and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Lazich, Jauch, Lassa and Olsen
- Feb 2, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families
- Feb 10, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 11, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Kestell and Milroy
- Jan 25, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Kestell and Milroy
- Feb 8, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1