Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
granting high school credit for extracurricular sports; services provided by a special education program; transportation aid paid to school districts; the use of moneys received by a school district from the common school fund; using the results of standardized examinations to evaluate, discharge, suspend, or discipline a teacher or for the nonrenewal of a teacher's contract; the number of teaching days scheduled in the Milwaukee Public Schools; permitting a school district to limit the grades in which to reduce class size under the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education Program; permitting a school board to deny enrollment to a pupil who has been expelled from an out-of-state school or from an independent charter school in this state and permitting an independent charter school to expel a pupil; use of law enforcement records to take disciplinary action against a pupil under a school district's athletic code; and changing the date by which a school district must certify the amount of its property tax levy.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes a number of changes to the laws governing public education.
Pupil expulsion
Under current law, a school board may expel a pupil only if the pupil engaged
in certain prohibited conduct while at school or while under the supervision of a
school authority. Generally, the prohibited conduct is conduct that endangers the
property, health, or safety of others or interferes with the ability of school authorities
to maintain order or an educational atmosphere at school. Prior to expelling a pupil,
the school board must follow certain procedures. These procedures include holding
an expulsion hearing and providing the pupil and, if the pupil is a minor, his or her
parent, with written and timely notice of the hearing.
Also under current law, a school board may refuse to enroll a pupil during the
term of the pupil's expulsion from another school district. In an opinion issued on
April 10, 2008, the Wisconsin attorney general determined that current law does not
permit a school district to refuse to enroll a pupil who is currently expelled from a
private school or an out-of-state school.
Current law permits the University of Wisconsin (UW)-Milwaukee,
UW-Parkside, the Milwaukee Area Technical College, and the city of Milwaukee to
operate charter schools (independent charter schools) directly or to contract for the
operation of charter schools. Generally, charter schools operate with fewer
constraints than traditional public schools. Current law does not explicitly authorize
an independent charter school to expel a pupil.
This bill permits an independent charter school to include in its charter or
contract grounds for expelling a pupil provided the grounds duplicate the grounds
provided under current law to school boards. If a charter or contract of an
independent charter school includes grounds for expelling a pupil, the charter or
contract must also include the same procedural requirements established for the
expulsion of a pupil by a school board under current law.
This bill authorizes a school board to refuse to enroll a pupil during the term
of the pupil's expulsion from a public school in another state if the grounds for the
pupil's expulsion would have been grounds for expulsion in this state. This bill also
permits a school board to refuse to enroll a pupil during the term of the pupil's
expulsion from an independent charter school if the charter or contract of the
independent charter school contains the grounds for expulsion and procedural
requirements identified above.
Under current law, a school board may include early reinstatement conditions
in an expulsion order issued for a pupil. Current law defines "early reinstatement
condition" as a condition that a pupil must meet before he or she may be granted early
reinstatement or a condition that a pupil must meet after his or her early
reinstatement but before the expiration of the term of expulsion specified in the
pupil's expulsion order. Early reinstatement conditions must relate to the reasons
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- May 16, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kestell, Bernier, Brooks, Farrow, Marklein, Petrowski, Spanbauer, Steineke, Strachota and Knodl;Cosponsored by Senators Olsen and Darling
- May 16, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- May 16, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Kapenga added as a coauthor
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Endsley added as a coauthor
- Jun 3, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Kestell
- Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Kestell
- Jun 9, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1