Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
motor vehicle dealers.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, each manufacturer, importer, distributor, and dealer of
motor vehicles that wishes to sell motor vehicles in this state must be licensed by the
Department of Transportation (DOT). The manufacturer, importer, or distributor
may have its license revoked and may be liable for pecuniary losses and attorney fees
incurred by the dealer, if the manufacturer, importer, or distributor takes certain
actions with respect to a dealer that have been enumerated as violations.
This bill enumerates several additional actions of a manufacturer, importer, or
distributor with respect to a dealer as violations. These newly designated violations
are: 1) conditioning certain agreements or approvals on the dealer's entry into a
contract that allows the manufacturer, importer, or distributor to control the
disposition or use of the dealer's dealership facilities; 2) unreasonably conditioning
certain agreements or approvals on the dealer's improvement of the dealer's
dealership facilities at a substantial cost to the dealer; 3) unreasonably requiring a
dealer to maintain exclusive facilities for a particular line make of motor vehicles;
4) taking certain adverse actions against a dealer for charging a lawful service fee
to a retail customer; 5) taking certain adverse actions against a dealer because,
without the dealer's knowledge that the purchaser intended to export the motor
vehicle, a motor vehicle purchaser exported a motor vehicle; 6) with certain
exceptions, requiring a dealer to provide the manufacturer, importer, or distributor
with information regarding the dealer's retail customers; 7) transferring nonpublic
customer information obtained from a dealer to another dealer or otherwise using
nonpublic customer information obtained from a dealer for a nonpermitted use; and
8) failing to properly indemnify a dealer.
Under current law, a manufacturer, importer, or distributor must reasonably
compensate a dealer that performs certain motor vehicle service work for the
manufacturer, importer, or distributor. Covered service work is work to rectify
product defects or other defects covered by the warranty provided by the
manufacturer, importer, or distributor, certain motor vehicle delivery or preparation
obligations, and any other work approved by the manufacturer, importer, or
distributor. The manufacturer, importer, or distributor must compensate the dealer,
for service, at the effective labor rate charged to all customers and, for parts,
generally at not less than the amount the dealer charges other retail service
customers for the parts. To be eligible for compensation, a dealer must notify the
manufacturer, importer, or distributor of the amount that the dealer charges other
retail service customers for parts. The manufacturer, importer, or distributor may
require the dealer to provide documentary substantiation of the claimed amount the
dealer charges for parts.
This bill requires a manufacturer, importer, or distributor to compensate a
dealer based on the dealer's "effective nonwarranty labor rate" and "average
percentage markup over dealer cost for parts." To be eligible for compensation, a
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Barca (D) , Bernier (R) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Endsley (R) , Kestell (R) , Klenke (R) , Mason (D) , Mursau (R) , Petersen (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Seidel (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Steinbrink (D) , T. Larson (R) , Vruwink (D) , Weininger (R) , Williams (R) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0
Passed 15–0 Jun 2, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ballweg, Barca, Bernier, Brooks, Clark, Endsley, Kestell, Klenke, T. Larson, Mason, Mursau, A. Ott, Petersen, Petryk, Ripp, Seidel, Spanbauer, Steinbrink, Vruwink, Weininger, Williams and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Leibham, Carpenter, Cowles, T. Cullen, Erpenbach, Hansen, Holperin, Kapanke, Lasee, Olsen, Schultz, Wanggaard and Wirch
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- May 17, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Murtha added as a coauthor
- May 24, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 26, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 27, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Tiffany added as a coauthor
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 14, Noes 1
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1