Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 147

Inadmissibility of a statement of apology or condolence by a health care provider

Topics: Court: Procedure, Damage (personal injury), Death, Evidence, Medical malpractice, Medical service, Nurses, Physician, Trades and occupations

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Oct 25, 2011, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 23, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Oct 25, 2011

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, certain types of evidence are not allowed to be admitted in a court action for various policy reasons. For example, evidence of remedial measures taken after an event occurred that would have made the event less likely is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event. As another example, no written or oral communication relating to a dispute in mediation is admissible or subject to discovery in any judicial proceeding or administrative action.

This bill provides that a statement or conduct of a health care provider that expresses apology, benevolence, compassion, condolence, fault, liability, remorse, responsibility, or sympathy to a patient or patient's relative or representative is not admissible into evidence or subject to discovery in any civil action or administrative hearing regarding the health care provider as evidence of liability or as an admission against interest.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 18 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (6)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 3 · Sep 7, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 33 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 33”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to take it up right away

Passed, 59 to 34 · Oct 25, 2011 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (59)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 59, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 62 to 33 · Nov 1, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 33, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 2, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations.

  3. Nov 2, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  4. Nov 1, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 62 to 33.

  5. Oct 25, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Sep 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Sep 7, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 3.

  8. Jun 1, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. May 23, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  10. May 23, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Severson, Nygren, Strachota, Kaufert, Bewley, Bies, Brooks, Jacque, Ripp, Spanbauer, Tauchen and Thiesfeldt;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Cowles, Darling, Holperin, Schultz and Wanggaard

  2. May 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health

  3. Jun 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Aug 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Health, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  6. Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Severson

  8. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules

  9. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Richards, Pocan, Hebl, Seidel, Kessler, C. Taylor and Pasch

  11. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 33

  12. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  13. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to read a third time, Ayes 59, Noes 34

  15. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:02 A.M. on 11-1-2011 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 16

  16. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 62, Noes 33, Paired 2

  17. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Nov 2, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Utilities, Commerce, and Government Operations

  20. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote