Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 160

Ambient air quality standards established by the Department of Natural Resources and the suspension of a rule promulgated by the Department of Natural Resources

Topics: Administrative rules: Bill to suspend existing rule [s.227.26 (2)(f)], Air pollution, Natural Resources, Department of: Environmental protection

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 27, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for each of six air pollutants. Under current state law, when EPA establishes an NAAQS for a pollutant, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) must promulgate by rule a similar standard that may not be more restrictive than the federal standard.

Generally, the EPA establishes two types of standards. Standards that are established to protect public health are primary standards and standards that are established to protect public welfare are secondary standards.

Read the full summary

Current law provides that if EPA modifies an NAAQS that was in effect on April 30, 1980, DNR must alter the corresponding state standard unless it finds that the modified standard would not provide adequate protection for public health and welfare. This bill provides that the requirement that DNR alter a corresponding state standard does not authorize DNR to alter any state secondary standard so that it is more restrictive than the corresponding federal standard.

This bill is introduced as required by s. 227.26 (2) (f), stats., in support of the action of the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules in suspending section NR 404.04 (3), Wis. Adm. Code, a rule of the Department of Natural Resources on April 27, 2011.

Who's behind it

Committee for review of Administrative Rules is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

  • Committee for review of Administrative Rules

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Sep 13, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  3. Jul 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Jun 28, 2011

    “Joint committee for Review of Administrative Rules report received pursuant to s. 227.26(2)(g), Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  5. Jun 20, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. May 27, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  7. May 27, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by joint committee for review of Administrative Rules

  2. May 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. Jun 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Joint committee for Review of Administrative Rules report received pursuant to s. 227.26(2)(g), Wisconsin Statutes

  5. Jul 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report without recommendation pursuant to s. 227.26 (2)(h), Wisconsin Statutes, by committee on Natural Resources

  6. Jul 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 9-13-2011 by committee on Rules

  8. Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Natural Resources

  9. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate