Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 175

Requiring persons who violate certain restraining orders or injunctions to be monitored by a global positioning system, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty

Topics: Corrections, Department of, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals, Data processing, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Women

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 8, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, an individual who is, or who acts on behalf of, a victim of abuse, harassment, or threats may obtain a temporary restraining order against the person who has committed the acts of abuse, harassment, or making a threat. The restraining order bars the person from contacting the victim and requires the person to stay away from the victim's residence and other places temporarily occupied by the victim until a court conducts a hearing to determine whether the restraining order should be incorporated into a longer lasting injunction.

If the court determines that the person has engaged in, or may engage in, acts of abuse, harassment, or threats against the victim, the court may issue an injunction against the person. An injunction may stay in effect for up to four years and bars the person from contacting the victim, requires the person to stay away from the victim's residence, and may require the person to stay away from other locations temporarily occupied by the victim.

Read the full summary

A person who violates a restraining order or an injunction may be fined up to $1,000 and imprisoned for up to nine months, except that a person who violates a restraining order or injunction that was issued only for harassment faces the same fine but may be imprisoned for up to 90 days.

This bill allows a court to order a person who is convicted of violating a restraining order or an injunction to submit, for the duration of the restraining order or injunction, to global positioning system (GPS) tracking by the Department of Corrections (DOC). The bill also allows a court to order, as a condition of release, a person who is charged with violating a restraining order or an injunction to submit to GPS tracking. The bill requires the court to consider a request for GPS tracking by a district attorney or by the individual who asked for the restraining order.

Under the bill, DOC must monitor the person's whereabouts with a GPS device and, if the person enters into an area that he or she is required to avoid under the terms of the restraining order or injunction, DOC must immediately notify local law enforcement and the victim. Under the bill, a person who violates a restraining order is required to pay a $200 surcharge in addition to his or her fine that will be used toward the costs of GPS tracking. Under the bill, the court may order the person to pay for the costs of GPS tracking. The bill makes it a Class I felony, punishable by a fine up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to three years and six months, or both, for a person to tamper with the GPS device.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

22 lawmakers are its ⁠. 18 are Republicans, 3 are Democrats and 1 is a Independent.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 30 names

Authors (22)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 27, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 27, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 27, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  4. Nov 3, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Oct 6, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Sep 29, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Jun 17, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Jun 15, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Jun 14, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Jun 8, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections.

  11. Jun 8, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives August, Kerkman, Suder, Bernier, Brooks, Farrow, Honadel, Kaufert, Kleefisch, Kooyenga, Kramer, Kuglitsch, LeMahieu, Marklein, Milroy, A. Ott, Pasch, Petersen, Spanbauer, Steineke, Zepnick and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Zipperer, Carpenter, Galloway, Hansen, Harsdorf, Moulton, Vinehout and Wanggaard

  2. Jun 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections

  3. Jun 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Oct 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Oct 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative August

  9. Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative August

  11. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative August

  12. Feb 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  14. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  15. Feb 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  18. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote