Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 18

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

collection and analysis of motor vehicle traffic stop information and law enforcement training standards.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, as created in

2009 Wisconsin Act 28

(the biennial budget

act), law enforcement officers must collect, at each motor vehicle traffic stop made

after December 31, 2010, all information specified by rule promulgated by the Office

of Justice Assistance (OJA) in the Department of Administration (DOA). This

information must then be submitted by the law enforcement agency to OJA. OJA

must analyze this information to determine whether the number of motor vehicle

stops and searches involving racial minorities is disproportionate compared to

nonminorities. OJA was required to submit its proposed rules to the Legislative

Council staff by February 1, 2010. The biennial budget act also required DOA to

submit a report to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) that includes certain

information related to the development of a traffic stop information collection

system. System development cannot begin until JCF approves the report.

This bill repeals the statutory provisions of the biennial budget act relating to

the collection and analysis of traffic stop information and requires that, if the

development of a traffic stop information system has already commenced, this

system development must terminate on the effective date of the bill.

Current law, as created in the biennial budget act, also requires law

enforcement training programs to provide training designed to prevent racial

profiling or race-based discrimination as a basis for detaining, searching, or

arresting a person. The bill also repeals this training requirement.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bernier (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Farrow (R) , Jacque (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Kooyenga (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Mursau (R) , Nass (R) , Petersen (R) , Ripp (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Strachota (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Vos (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)

6 cosponsors

Grothman (R) , Jauch (D) , Lazich (R) , Leibham (R) , Schultz (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 5, Noes 3

Passed 5–3 May 12, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Bernier, Jacque, Mursau, Thiesfeldt, Nass, Farrow, Brooks, LeMahieu, Vos, Ziegelbauer, Petersen, Kerkman, Ripp, Kooyenga, Bies, Strachota, Kleefisch, Kestell, Marklein and Spanbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Lazich, Wanggaard, Grothman, Schultz, Leibham and Jauch

  2. Feb 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections

  3. Feb 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 21, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  9. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. May 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-17-2011 by committee on Rules

  11. Sep 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1