Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
liability of cities, villages, towns, and counties for damages caused by an insufficiency or want of repair of a highway.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are immune from claims
arising out of the performance of a discretionary duty, or duty that requires a
governmental entity to use judgment or discretion in carrying out the duty. Cities,
villages, towns, and counties are liable for damages of up to $50,000 arising out of
the performance of a nondiscretionary duty.
Also under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are liable for
damages of up to $50,000 to a person or property resulting from an insufficiency or
want of repair of a highway, which includes shoulders, sidewalks, and bridges.
Cities, villages, towns, and counties are also liable for damages resulting from the
accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in
Morris v. Juneau County
, 219 Wis. 2d 544
(1998), held that the statutory provision imposing liability on cities, villages, towns,
and counties for highway defects is an exception to the more general provision
granting immunity to cities, villages, towns, and counties from liability arising out
of the performance of discretionary duties.
Finally, under current law, if the negligence or deliberate wrongdoing of a
person contributes to the creation of a highway defect that results in damages to a
person or property, the negligent or wrongdoing person is primarily liable and the
city, village, town, or county is secondarily liable only if the negligent person or the
person who committed the wrongdoing does not satisfy the judgment, and the city,
village, town, or county is otherwise liable for the damages.
This bill eliminates the specific immunity exception under which cities,
villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for an insufficiency or want of repairs
of a highway. This bill does not affect the immunity exception under which cities,
villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for damages of up to $50,000 for the
accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.
The bill also eliminates secondary liability for cities, villages, towns, and counties.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 5
Passed 10–5 Oct 25, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 13, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Brooks, Bernier, Kaufert, Knudson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Spanbauer, Strachota, Vos and Weininger;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Galloway, Lasee and Lazich
- Jun 13, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Jun 27, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 29, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 5
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-26-2012 by committee on Rules
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Mason, Vruwink, Pasch, C. Taylor, Ringhand, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, Bernard Schaber, Danou, Sinicki, Zepnick, Kessler, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Clark, Seidel, Roys, Barca, Molepske Jr, E. Coggs, Hintz, Bewley, Pocan, Billings, Richards and Jorgensen
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1