Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 180

Liability of cities, villages, towns, and counties for damages caused by an insufficiency or want of repair of a highway

Topics: Claims, County, Damage (to property), Municipality, Road: Construction and repair, Town, Village

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jun 13, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are immune from claims arising out of the performance of a discretionary duty, or duty that requires a governmental entity to use judgment or discretion in carrying out the duty. Cities, villages, towns, and counties are liable for damages of up to $50,000 arising out of the performance of a nondiscretionary duty.

Also under current law, cities, villages, towns, and counties are liable for damages of up to $50,000 to a person or property resulting from an insufficiency or want of repair of a highway, which includes shoulders, sidewalks, and bridges.

Read the full summary

Cities, villages, towns, and counties are also liable for damages resulting from the accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Morris v. Juneau County , 219 Wis. 2d 544 (1998), held that the statutory provision imposing liability on cities, villages, towns, and counties for highway defects is an exception to the more general provision granting immunity to cities, villages, towns, and counties from liability arising out of the performance of discretionary duties.

Finally, under current law, if the negligence or deliberate wrongdoing of a person contributes to the creation of a highway defect that results in damages to a person or property, the negligent or wrongdoing person is primarily liable and the city, village, town, or county is secondarily liable only if the negligent person or the person who committed the wrongdoing does not satisfy the judgment, and the city, village, town, or county is otherwise liable for the damages.

This bill eliminates the specific immunity exception under which cities, villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for an insufficiency or want of repairs of a highway. This bill does not affect the immunity exception under which cities, villages, towns, and counties may be held liable for damages of up to $50,000 for the accumulation of snow or ice that has existed on a highway for at least three weeks.

The bill also eliminates secondary liability for cities, villages, towns, and counties.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 11 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 5 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 25, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Oct 25, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.

  4. Aug 30, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Jun 29, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jun 27, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Jun 13, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  8. Jun 13, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jun 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jacque, Brooks, Bernier, Kaufert, Knudson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Spanbauer, Strachota, Vos and Weininger;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Galloway, Lasee and Lazich

  2. Jun 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Jun 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  8. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-26-2012 by committee on Rules

  10. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Mason, Vruwink, Pasch, C. Taylor, Ringhand, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, Bernard Schaber, Danou, Sinicki, Zepnick, Kessler, Hebl, Pope-Roberts, Clark, Seidel, Roys, Barca, Molepske Jr, E. Coggs, Hintz, Bewley, Pocan, Billings, Richards and Jorgensen

  11. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote