Assembly Bill 183
Applicability of the prevailing wage law; the thresholds for applicability of that law; calculation of the prevailing wage rate; the treatment of volunteers, truck drivers, subjourneypersons, and incidental work under that law; the submission to the Department of Workforce Development of payroll records of persons performing work that is subject to that law; the inspection of those records; and the remedies for a violation of that law
Topics: Apprenticeship, Labor, Municipality, Public works, Trades and occupations, Wage: Payment, Workforce Development, Department of
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 16, 2011
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under the current prevailing wage law, certain laborers, workers, mechanics, and truck drivers employed on a state or local project of public works must be paid at the rate paid for a majority of the hours worked in the person's trade or occupation in the county in which the project is located, as determined by the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), and may not be required or permitted to work a greater number of hours per day and per week than the prevailing hours of labor, that is, no more than ten hours per day and 40 hours per week, unless they are paid 1.5 times their basic rate of pay (overtime pay) for all hours worked in excess of the prevailing hours of labor.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 made various changes to the prevailing wage law, including: 1) expanding the applicability of that law to cover publicly funded private construction projects and certain projects acquired by, or dedicated to, a local governmental unit or the state; 2) lowering the threshold for applicability of that law to a project of public works; 3) requiring contractors to submit payroll records to DWD; 4) requiring DWD to charge a requester for the cost of inspecting payroll records only if the request is frivolous; and 5) permitting DWD to order back pay and liquidated damages for a violation of that law. This bill alters or eliminates those changes. The bill also makes certain changes relating to: 1) statewide uniformity of the prevailing wage law; 2) calculation of the prevailing wage rate; 3) nonapplicability of the prevailing wage law to small municipalities and small residential projects; and 4) the treatment of volunteers, truck drivers, subjourneypersons, and incidental work under the prevailing wage law.
Read the full summary Show less
Specifically, with respect to altering or eliminating changes made by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 :
1.
Publicly funded private construction projects, turnkey projects, and acquired or dedicated projects.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 expanded the applicability of the prevailing wage law to cover publicly funded private construction projects that receive $1,000,000 or more in direct financial assistance from a local governmental unit. Under prior law, only projects of public works contracted for by the state or a local governmental unit were subject to the prevailing wage law. This bill eliminates coverage of publicly funded private construction projects under the prevailing wage law, so that under the bill only projects of public works are covered under the prevailing wage law.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 specified that the prevailing wage law applies to: 1) a project in which the completed facility is leased, lease purchased, or otherwise acquired by, or dedicated to, a local governmental unit or the state in lieu of the local governmental unit or the state contracting for the erection, construction, repair, remodeling, or demolition of the facility (turnkey project); and 2) a road, street, bridge, sanitary sewer, or water main project in which the completed road, street, bridge, sanitary sewer, or water main is acquired by, or dedicated to, a local governmental unit or the state, for ownership or maintenance by the local governmental unit or the state (acquired or dedicated project). This bill specifies that the prevailing wage law does not apply to a turnkey project or to an acquired or dedicated project.
2.
Threshold for applicability to public works projects.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 lowered the threshold for applicability of the prevailing wage law to a project of public works so that a project of public works for which the estimated project cost of completion is below $25,000 is not subject to that law. The act also eliminated the authority of DWD to adjust that threshold based on changes in construction costs.
Under prior law, that threshold was $234,000 for a multiple-trade project of public works and $48,000 for a single-trade project of public works and DWD was authorized to adjust those amounts annually based on changes on construction costs.
This bill sets the threshold for applicability of the prevailing wage law to a single-trade project of public works at an estimated project cost of completion of $50,000 and the threshold for applicability of that law to a multiple-trade project of public works at an estimated project cost of completion of $250,000. The bill, however, does not restore the authority of DWD to adjust those thresholds.
3.
Submission of payroll records.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 required contractors performing work on a project of public works or a publicly funded private construction project that is subject to the prevailing wage law to submit to DWD on a monthly basis, in electronic format, certified records indicating the name and trade or occupation of every person performing work that is subject to the prevailing wage law and an accurate record of the number of hours worked by each of those persons and the actual wages paid for those hours worked (payroll records) or, if all persons performing work on the project are covered under a collective bargaining agreement that provides for wage rates that are not less than the prevailing wage rate, to submit to DWD during the first month of the project, in electronic format, copies of all collective bargaining agreements pertaining to the project. This bill eliminates that requirement.
4.
Inspection of payroll records.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 required DWD to charge a person who requests DWD to inspect a contractor's payroll records for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the prevailing wage law the actual cost of the inspection if the contractor is found to be in compliance with that law and if the request is found to be frivolous. Prior law required DWD to charge that cost if the contractor was found to be in compliance with the prevailing wage law, but did not require the additional finding that the request was frivolous. This bill eliminates that additional finding so that under the bill DWD must charge for the cost of inspecting a contractor's payroll records if the contractor is found to be in compliance with the prevailing wage law, whether or not the request is frivolous.
5.
Remedies for a violation of the prevailing wage law.
2009 Wisconsin Act 28 permitted DWD to order a contractor who failed to pay the prevailing wage rate to pay to any affected employee the amount of unpaid wages due, plus 100 percent of that amount as liquidated damages. Prior law permitted only a court to order that payment and permitted that payment to be ordered only to an employee employed on a local project of public works, not to an employee employed on a state project of public works. This bill eliminates the authority of DWD to order that payment so that under the bill only a court may order that payment and permits that payment to be ordered only to an employee employed on a local project of public works, not to an employee employed on a state project of public works.
Finally, the bill makes changes to certain areas of the prevailing wage law that were not substantially affected by 2009 Wisconsin Act 28 . Specifically:
1.
Statewide concern; uniformity.
The bill states that the enactment of prevailing wage ordinances or other enactments by local governmental units would be logically inconsistent with, would defeat the purpose of, and would go against the spirit of the state prevailing wage law. Therefore, as an enactment of statewide concern for the purpose of providing a uniform prevailing wage law throughout the state, the bill prohibits local governmental units from enacting prevailing wage ordinances or other enactments and provides that a local prevailing wage ordinance or other enactment that is in effect on the day before the effective date of the bill is void.
2.
Calculation of prevailing wage rate.
Under current law, "prevailing wage rate" is defined as the hourly basic rate of pay, plus the hourly contribution for bona fide economic benefits, paid for a majority of the hours worked in a trade or occupation in an area, except that, if there is no rate at which a majority of those hours is paid, "prevailing wage rate" means the average hourly basic rate of pay, plus the average hourly contribution for bona fide economic benefits, paid for the highest 51 percent of hours worked in a trade or occupation in the area. Current law defines "bona fide economic benefit" as an economic benefit for which an employer makes irrevocable contributions or escrow payments at least quarterly.
This bill defines "prevailing wage rate," when there is no rate at which a majority of the hours worked in a trade or occupation in an area is paid, as the average hourly basic rate of pay, plus the average hourly contribution for bona fide economic benefits, paid for all hours worked in a trade or occupation in the area. The bill also deletes the definition of "bona fide economic benefit."
3.
Nonapplicability to small municipalities and residential properties.
The bill exempts from the prevailing wage law a project of public works contracted by a city, village, or town having a population of less than 10,000 and a project of public works involving the erection, construction, repair, remodeling, or demolition of a residential property containing two dwelling units or less.
4.
Treatment of volunteers, truck drivers, subjourneypersons, and incidental work.
Under current law, the prevailing wage law does not apply to a project of public works in which the labor for the project is provided by unpaid volunteers. This bill provides that the prevailing wage law does not apply to work performed on a project of public works for which the local governmental unit or state agency contracting for the project is not required to compensate any contractor, subcontractor, contractor's or subcontractor's agent, or individual for performing the work.
Under current law, the prevailing wage law does not apply to a truck driver who is regularly employed to pick up or deliver materials or products from a commercial establishment that has a fixed place of business from which the establishment regularly supplies processed or manufactured materials or products unless: 1) the truck driver is employed to pick up mineral aggregate from its source and deliver that aggregate to the site of a project of public works; or 2) the truck driver is employed to pick up excavated material from the site of such a project and transport that material away from that site. This bill provides that the prevailing wage law does not apply to a truck driver who is employed to pick up and deliver mineral aggregate to the site of a project of public works or to pick up and transport excavated material away from such a site.
The bill also permits a contractor, subcontractor, or contractor's or subcontractor's agent to employ a subjourneyperson on any project that is subject to the prevailing wage law. The bill defines a "subjourneyperson" as a worker, other than an apprentice, laborer, heavy equipment operator, or truck driver, who primarily works under the direction of, and who assists, a skilled trade employee by frequently using the tools of a specific trade.
Finally, the bill permits a contractor performing work on a project to which the prevailing wage law applies to employ a worker in incidental work outside of the worker's usual trade or occupation for not more than 25 percent of the hours worked by the worker in a workweek.
Who's behind it
41 lawmakers are its . 40 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 48 names Hide the names
Authors (41)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Paul F. Farrow · Republican, Senate
- Jim Ott · Republican, Assembly
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kleefisch · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Knilans · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Dean Knudson · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Michelle Litjens · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Dan Meyer · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Murtha · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry Petrowski · Republican, Senate
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Roger Rivard · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Jim Steineke · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Williams · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Ziegelbauer · Independent, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Joe Leibham · Republican, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Jul 6, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 30, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 16, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business.
-
Jun 16, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Williams, Nass, Brooks, Tauchen, Strachota, J. Ott, A. Ott, Ballweg, Bernier, Jacque, Kapenga, Kestell, Knodl, Knudson, Kuglitsch, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Litjens, Marklein, Meyer, Murtha, Nerison, Petrowski, Petryk, Rivard, Thiesfeldt, Tiffany, Tranel, Van Roy, Wynn, Ziegelbauer, Ripp, Spanbauer, Kerkman, Steineke, Mursau, Farrow, Craig, Kleefisch, Knilans and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Lasee, Grothman, Moulton, Leibham, Kedzie and Lazich
- Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business
- Jun 30, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 6, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 6, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jul 6, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate