Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 192

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

provision of police or fire protection services by a county sheriff or municipality.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, cities, villages, and towns (municipalities) and county

sheriffs are subject to varying requirements regarding the provision of police and fire

protection services. They are as follows:

1. A town board must provide fire protection services for the town and may

provide law enforcement services for the town or any portion of the town.

2. A village with a population of 5,500 or more must provide fire protection

services for the village. A village with a population of 5,000 or more must provide

police protection services for the village and a village with a population of less than

5,000 may provide police protection services.

3. A city must provide police and fire protection services for the city.

4. A county sheriff must provide law enforcement services for the county.

Also under current law, a city or village may, subject to certain requirements,

abolish its police department and contract with the county for the county sheriff to

provide police protection services for the city or village.

Under this bill, a municipality may not condition the provision of fire or police

protection services and a sheriff may not condition the provision of law enforcement

services on a person's payment of a fee, charge, or tax. Also, a contract between a city

or village and a county for the county sheriff to provide law enforcement services for

the city or village must require that the county sheriff not condition the provision of

police protection services in the city or village on a person's payment of a fee, charge,

or tax.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Bewley (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Mason (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D)

5 cosponsors

Hansen (D) , Lassa (D) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

Passed 7–1 Oct 3, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pocan, Barca, Berceau, Bewley, Hintz, Hulsey, Jorgensen, Mason, Pasch, Pope-Roberts, Ringhand, Roys and Sinicki;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Lassa, Risser, Schultz and Taylor

  2. Jun 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Pocan

  6. Sep 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Oct 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  8. Oct 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 1

  9. Oct 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  12. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  15. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  17. Mar 19, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1