Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 2

Authorizing the designation of additional enterprise zones and requiring the designation of enterprise zones in rural areas

Topics: Business, Commerce, Department of, Corporation: Taxation, Industrial development, Municipality: Planning, Rural planning

Became law

The governor signed it on Jun 13, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 14, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 93 to 0

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 26 to 7

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 26

Latest entry in the official record, Jun 15, 2011: “Published 6-24-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) may designate an area as an enterprise zone. Commerce must consider a number of factors related to the area prior to designating the area as an enterprise zone, including indicators of the area's economic need and whether designation as an enterprise zone would promote the retention of jobs in the area. A taxpayer who creates or retains jobs in an enterprise zone may claim certain credits against state income and franchise taxes. Currently, Commerce may designate no more than 12 enterprise zones. This bill permits Commerce to designate a total of 16 enterprise zones.

In determining whether to designate an area an enterprise zone, current law requires Commerce to consider specified indicators of the area's economic need and specified indicators of the effect of designation on other initiatives and programs to promote economic and community development in the area. Current law also requires Commerce to give preference to the greatest economic need. This bill requires Commerce to designate two additional enterprise zones in political subdivisions with populations of less than 5,000 and two additional enterprise zones in political subdivisions with populations between 5,000 and 29,999 (rural zones), notwithstanding the current factors Commerce must consider.

Read the full summary

Currently, a business that retains jobs in an enterprise zone is eligible for tax credits if the business makes a significant capital investment in property located in the enterprise zone and at least one of the following applies: 1) the business is an original equipment manufacturer with a significant supply chain in the state; or 2) the business has more than 500 full-time employees in the enterprise zone. Under the bill, a business that retains jobs in a rural zone and makes a significant capital investment in property located in the rural zone is eligible for tax credits; no additional showing is required.

Who's behind it

16 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 16 are Republicans.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 21 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 8 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Mar 24, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Apr 6, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 93 to 0 · Apr 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 93, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 91 to 2 · Apr 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 91, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 93 to 0 · Apr 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 adopted, Ayes 93, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 35 · Apr 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 79 to 12 · Apr 12, 2011 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 92 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (79)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 79, Noes 12, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 26 to 7 · May 10, 2011

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 26, Noes 7”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jun 15, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Jun 13, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 26.

  3. Jun 9, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. May 10, 2011

    The Senate passed it too, 26 to 7.

  5. Apr 14, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Apr 13, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  7. Apr 12, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 79 to 12.

  8. Apr 12, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it, 93 to 0.

  9. Apr 12, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it, 91 to 2.

  10. Apr 12, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it, 93 to 0.

  11. Apr 6, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Apr 6, 2011

    “Report passage as amended, with emergency statement attached, pursuant to s. 16.47 (2), Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by joint committee on Finance” (the official wording)

  13. Mar 24, 2011

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  14. Mar 24, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 3.

  15. Feb 23, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Feb 9, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Feb 3, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Jan 14, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs.

  19. Jan 14, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Rivard, Williams, Severson, Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Krug, LeMahieu, Mursau, A. Ott, Petrowski, Ripp, Spanbauer, Steineke, Tranel and Kestell;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Harsdorf, Holperin, Lasee and Moulton

  2. Jan 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs

  3. Feb 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 2, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs

  8. Mar 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Mar 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development and Rural Affairs, Ayes 10, Noes 3

  10. Mar 24, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  11. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance

  13. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by joint committee on Finance

  14. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  15. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 1

  16. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 1

  17. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended, with emergency statement attached, pursuant to s. 16.47 (2), Wisconsin Statutes, recommended by joint committee on Finance

  18. Apr 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  19. Apr 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-12-2011 by committee on Rules

  20. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 93, Noes 0

  22. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 91, Noes 2

  23. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 adopted, Ayes 93, Noes 0

  24. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Bernard Schaber and Barca

  25. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 35

  26. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  28. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 79, Noes 12, Paired 4

  29. Apr 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Apr 13, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  31. Apr 14, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  32. Apr 14, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  33. May 9, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  34. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  35. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  37. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 26, Noes 7

  38. May 10, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  39. May 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  40. May 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  41. Jun 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 6-9-2011

  42. Jun 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 6-10-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 26

  43. Jun 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Published 6-24-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote