Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
state procurement of products and services from businesses located in this state and setting a goal for local government to purchase a certain percentage of products and services from businesses located in this state.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally authorizes the Department of Administration (DOA) to
purchase, or delegate the authority to purchase, all necessary materials and
contractual services for all state agencies. With some exceptions, orders or contracts
must be awarded to the lowest bidder. This bill creates an exception to require DOA
and any agency making purchases to attempt to ensure that at least 20 percent of
the total amount expended for such procurement in each fiscal year is from
Wisconsin-based businesses and that, in any fiscal year, the percentage of the total
amount expended from Wisconsin-based businesses will not be lower than it was in
the previous fiscal year. To measure compliance with this exception, this bill requires
DOA to collect data from a person who bids for a contract regarding the person's
principal place of business. DOA must submit to the legislature a plan on how DOA
will compile and use the data it collected.
This bill also sets a goal that at least 20 percent of the aggregate value of the
annual purchases of products and services by a local governmental unit (which
includes cities, villages, towns, counties, and special purpose districts, which include
schools and technical college districts) will be from Wisconsin-based businesses. A
further goal is that, in any year, the percentage of the aggregate value of routine
purchases of products and services from Wisconsin-based businesses will not be
lower than it was in the previous year.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59
Failed 38–59 Jun 21, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Clark, Molepske Jr, Roys, Berceau, Turner, Fields, D. Cullen, Pope-Roberts, Staskunas, Barca, Hintz, Jorgensen and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Erpenbach and Taylor
- Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs
- Feb 28, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 8, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 21, 2011 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1