Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 21

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

state procurement of products and services from businesses located in this state and setting a goal for local government to purchase a certain percentage of products and services from businesses located in this state.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law generally authorizes the Department of Administration (DOA) to

purchase, or delegate the authority to purchase, all necessary materials and

contractual services for all state agencies. With some exceptions, orders or contracts

must be awarded to the lowest bidder. This bill creates an exception to require DOA

and any agency making purchases to attempt to ensure that at least 20 percent of

the total amount expended for such procurement in each fiscal year is from

Wisconsin-based businesses and that, in any fiscal year, the percentage of the total

amount expended from Wisconsin-based businesses will not be lower than it was in

the previous fiscal year. To measure compliance with this exception, this bill requires

DOA to collect data from a person who bids for a contract regarding the person's

principal place of business. DOA must submit to the legislature a plan on how DOA

will compile and use the data it collected.

This bill also sets a goal that at least 20 percent of the aggregate value of the

annual purchases of products and services by a local governmental unit (which

includes cities, villages, towns, counties, and special purpose districts, which include

schools and technical college districts) will be from Wisconsin-based businesses. A

further goal is that, in any year, the percentage of the aggregate value of routine

purchases of products and services from Wisconsin-based businesses will not be

lower than it was in the previous year.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Clark (D) , D. Cullen (D) , Fields (D) , Hintz (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Roys (D) , Staskunas (D) , Turner (D) , Vruwink (D)

3 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary

Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59

Failed 38–59 Jun 21, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Clark, Molepske Jr, Roys, Berceau, Turner, Fields, D. Cullen, Pope-Roberts, Staskunas, Barca, Hintz, Jorgensen and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Erpenbach and Taylor

  2. Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Feb 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 21, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 59

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  7. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1