Assembly Bill 210
Implementing health insurance reform, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority
Topics: Administrative rules, Federal-state relations, Insurance: Commissioner, Office of, Insurance: Health, Statutes: Revision
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Oct 18, 2011, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jul 29, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 59 to 37
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill incorporates the health insurance coverage requirements of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into the Wisconsin statutes. The bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions that went into effect for plan years beginning on or after March 23, 2010, relating to all of the following: 1) standards relating to benefits for mothers and newborns; 2) required coverage for reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy; and 3) coverage of a dependent student on a medically necessary leave of absence. The bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions that went into effect for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010, relating to all of the following: 1) prohibiting annual or lifetime limits; 2) prohibiting coverage rescissions; 3) prohibiting preexisting condition exclusions for individuals under age 19; 4) coverage of certain preventive health services without cost-sharing; 5) extension of coverage to dependents up to age 26; 6) the provision of additional information; 7) giving plan enrollees choice as to a primary care provider; and 8) coverage of emergency services without prior authorization. In addition, the bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions for plan years beginning on or after March 23, 2012, relating to all of the following: 1) the development and use of uniform explanation of coverage documents and standardized definitions; and 2) requirements for ensuring the quality of care. The bill also requires insurers to comply with the PPACA requirement to file a report for each plan year concerning the ratio of incurred loss, plus loss adjustment expense, to earned premiums and to provide a rebate to enrollees under certain circumstances. Under PPACA, the provisions apply to insurers offering medical care benefits under any hospital or medical service policy or plan contract.
A health care policy or plan that was in effect when PPACA was enacted is called a grandfathered health plan. The bill specifically requires a grandfathered health plan to comply, when the grandfathered health plan is renewed, with the following PPACA provisions: 1) coverage of a dependent student on a medically necessary leave of absence; 2) coverage of certain preventive health services without cost-sharing; 3) coverage of emergency services without prior authorization; and 4) at renewal on or after March 23, 2012, requirements for ensuring the quality of care.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill provides that the additional requirements under the bill with which insurers must comply apply to grandfathered health plans only with respect to those requirements that apply to grandfathered health plans under PPACA.
Current law requires health insurers to cover emergency services without prior authorization, breast reconstruction after a mastectomy, dependent coverage of a student while on a medically necessary leave of absence, and colorectal screening.
These coverage provisions are consistent with, and therefore duplicative of, the relevant PPACA requirements and are not repealed in the bill. Current law also requires health insurers to provide coverage of a dependent up to age 27, or up to any age if the dependent is a student and had to leave school previously because he or she was called to active duty in the armed forces. PPACA requires coverage of a dependent up to age 26 and has no additional requirement related to a student previously called to active duty. Because of this inconsistency, the current law dependent coverage provision is repealed in the bill. The bill specifies that, if PPACA is found by a final decision of a federal court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional in its entirety and unenforceable in this state, after all appeals have been exhausted or the time for appeal has expired insurers are exempt from the PPACA coverage requirements incorporated into the bill, with the exception of the provision related to dependent coverage. Thus, if PPACA were found unconstitutional, in addition to the dependent coverage requirement, insurers would be subject to the coverage requirements in current law that are consistent with PPACA and that have not been repealed in the bill.
Under current law, a health insurer must have an internal grievance procedure and an independent review procedure whereby an insured person may appeal certain types of coverage denials to an independent review organization. The statutes set out criteria for both procedures and provide for certification of independent review organizations by the commissioner of insurance (commissioner).
The bill repeals these provisions and requires the commissioner to establish standards by rule for both internal and external appeals that are consistent with requirements under PPACA. The requirements for internal appeals apply to all group and individual health insurance policies, grandfathered health plans, policies providing limited-scope dental or vision benefits, and hospital or fixed indemnity policies. The requirements for external appeals apply to all group and individual health insurance policies, grandfathered health plans, hospital or fixed indemnity policies, and Medicare supplement or replacement polices, excluding Medicare advantage plans. An independent review organization performing external appeals must be certified by the commissioner, who may revoke, suspend, or limit the certification or refuse to recertify under specified conditions. An independent review organization must have a quality assurance mechanism to ensure timely and independent reviews and may charge reasonable fees, which must be approved by the commissioner. The commissioner has authority to examine and audit an independent review organization's books and records. A decision of an independent review organization is binding on the insured and the insurer. An independent review organization is immune from any liability that may result from an independent review determination, and an insurer is not liable for any damages attributable to actions taken in compliance with an independent review organization determination.
Under current law, rates for insurance must be filed with the commissioner within 30 days after they become effective, and the commissioner may disapprove a rate after it has been filed. Certain types of insurance, including group and blanket accident and sickness insurance, are exempt from the rating requirement provisions, including the requirement to file rates. The bill provides that, beginning on September 1, 2011, group health insurance offered to employers with not more than 50 employees (small employer health insurance) and group and blanket accident and sickness insurance offered in the individual market are not exempt from the rating requirement provisions. In addition, the bill requires that rates for individual health insurance, small employer health insurance, and group and blanket accident and sickness insurance offered in the individual market be filed with the commissioner before, rather than after, they become effective.
Who's behind it
Kevin Petersen, a Republican, is its .
See all the details Hide the names
Author (1)
- Kevin Petersen · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 9 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 1 · Oct 11, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 15, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Failed, 41 to 55 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Health, Ayes 41, Noes 55”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 58 to 38 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Failed, 37 to 59 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 37, Noes 59”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 57 to 39 · Oct 18, 2011
See how each of the 96 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (57)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (39)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Donna Seidel (D, 85)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Tamara Grigsby (D, 18)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 39, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Oct 25, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 19, 2011
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.
-
Oct 19, 2011
The Senate received it.
-
Oct 18, 2011
The Assembly passed it, 57 to 39.
-
Oct 18, 2011
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Oct 18, 2011
The Assembly adopted it, 59 to 37.
-
Oct 11, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 11, 2011
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 4.
-
Sep 15, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Aug 26, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 15, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 9, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 3, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jul 29, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.
-
Jul 29, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jul 29, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Petersen
- Jul 29, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance
- Aug 3, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 15, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 26, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Insurance
- Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 15, Noes 1
- Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-18-2011 by committee on Rules
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Refused to refer to committee on Health, Ayes 41, Noes 55
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 38
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Refused to table Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 37, Noes 59
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 59, Noes 37
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Richards and Barca
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 39, Paired 2
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Oct 19, 2011 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing
- Oct 25, 2011 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2012 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote