Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 210

Implementing health insurance reform, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Administrative rules, Federal-state relations, Insurance: Commissioner, Office of, Insurance: Health, Statutes: Revision

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Oct 18, 2011, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 29, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 59 to 37

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill incorporates the health insurance coverage requirements of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into the Wisconsin statutes. The bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions that went into effect for plan years beginning on or after March 23, 2010, relating to all of the following: 1) standards relating to benefits for mothers and newborns; 2) required coverage for reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy; and 3) coverage of a dependent student on a medically necessary leave of absence. The bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions that went into effect for plan years beginning on or after September 23, 2010, relating to all of the following: 1) prohibiting annual or lifetime limits; 2) prohibiting coverage rescissions; 3) prohibiting preexisting condition exclusions for individuals under age 19; 4) coverage of certain preventive health services without cost-sharing; 5) extension of coverage to dependents up to age 26; 6) the provision of additional information; 7) giving plan enrollees choice as to a primary care provider; and 8) coverage of emergency services without prior authorization. In addition, the bill requires insurers to comply with PPACA provisions for plan years beginning on or after March 23, 2012, relating to all of the following: 1) the development and use of uniform explanation of coverage documents and standardized definitions; and 2) requirements for ensuring the quality of care. The bill also requires insurers to comply with the PPACA requirement to file a report for each plan year concerning the ratio of incurred loss, plus loss adjustment expense, to earned premiums and to provide a rebate to enrollees under certain circumstances. Under PPACA, the provisions apply to insurers offering medical care benefits under any hospital or medical service policy or plan contract.

A health care policy or plan that was in effect when PPACA was enacted is called a grandfathered health plan. The bill specifically requires a grandfathered health plan to comply, when the grandfathered health plan is renewed, with the following PPACA provisions: 1) coverage of a dependent student on a medically necessary leave of absence; 2) coverage of certain preventive health services without cost-sharing; 3) coverage of emergency services without prior authorization; and 4) at renewal on or after March 23, 2012, requirements for ensuring the quality of care.

Read the full summary

The bill provides that the additional requirements under the bill with which insurers must comply apply to grandfathered health plans only with respect to those requirements that apply to grandfathered health plans under PPACA.

Current law requires health insurers to cover emergency services without prior authorization, breast reconstruction after a mastectomy, dependent coverage of a student while on a medically necessary leave of absence, and colorectal screening.

These coverage provisions are consistent with, and therefore duplicative of, the relevant PPACA requirements and are not repealed in the bill. Current law also requires health insurers to provide coverage of a dependent up to age 27, or up to any age if the dependent is a student and had to leave school previously because he or she was called to active duty in the armed forces. PPACA requires coverage of a dependent up to age 26 and has no additional requirement related to a student previously called to active duty. Because of this inconsistency, the current law dependent coverage provision is repealed in the bill. The bill specifies that, if PPACA is found by a final decision of a federal court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional in its entirety and unenforceable in this state, after all appeals have been exhausted or the time for appeal has expired insurers are exempt from the PPACA coverage requirements incorporated into the bill, with the exception of the provision related to dependent coverage. Thus, if PPACA were found unconstitutional, in addition to the dependent coverage requirement, insurers would be subject to the coverage requirements in current law that are consistent with PPACA and that have not been repealed in the bill.

Under current law, a health insurer must have an internal grievance procedure and an independent review procedure whereby an insured person may appeal certain types of coverage denials to an independent review organization. The statutes set out criteria for both procedures and provide for certification of independent review organizations by the commissioner of insurance (commissioner).

The bill repeals these provisions and requires the commissioner to establish standards by rule for both internal and external appeals that are consistent with requirements under PPACA. The requirements for internal appeals apply to all group and individual health insurance policies, grandfathered health plans, policies providing limited-scope dental or vision benefits, and hospital or fixed indemnity policies. The requirements for external appeals apply to all group and individual health insurance policies, grandfathered health plans, hospital or fixed indemnity policies, and Medicare supplement or replacement polices, excluding Medicare advantage plans. An independent review organization performing external appeals must be certified by the commissioner, who may revoke, suspend, or limit the certification or refuse to recertify under specified conditions. An independent review organization must have a quality assurance mechanism to ensure timely and independent reviews and may charge reasonable fees, which must be approved by the commissioner. The commissioner has authority to examine and audit an independent review organization's books and records. A decision of an independent review organization is binding on the insured and the insurer. An independent review organization is immune from any liability that may result from an independent review determination, and an insurer is not liable for any damages attributable to actions taken in compliance with an independent review organization determination.

Under current law, rates for insurance must be filed with the commissioner within 30 days after they become effective, and the commissioner may disapprove a rate after it has been filed. Certain types of insurance, including group and blanket accident and sickness insurance, are exempt from the rating requirement provisions, including the requirement to file rates. The bill provides that, beginning on September 1, 2011, group health insurance offered to employers with not more than 50 employees (small employer health insurance) and group and blanket accident and sickness insurance offered in the individual market are not exempt from the rating requirement provisions. In addition, the bill requires that rates for individual health insurance, small employer health insurance, and group and blanket accident and sickness insurance offered in the individual market be filed with the commissioner before, rather than after, they become effective.

Who's behind it

Kevin Petersen, a Republican, is its ⁠.

See all the details

Author (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 9 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 1 · Oct 11, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 15, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Failed, 41 to 55 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on Health, Ayes 41, Noes 55”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 58 to 38 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Failed, 37 to 59 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 37, Noes 59”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 59 to 37 · Oct 18, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 57 to 39 · Oct 18, 2011

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (57)

No (39)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 39, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 25, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Oct 19, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance and Housing.

  4. Oct 19, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  5. Oct 18, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 57 to 39.

  6. Oct 18, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Oct 18, 2011

    The Assembly adopted it, 59 to 37.

  8. Oct 11, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Oct 11, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 4.

  10. Sep 15, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Aug 26, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Aug 15, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Aug 9, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Aug 3, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Jul 29, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.

  16. Jul 29, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Petersen

  2. Jul 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance

  3. Aug 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Aug 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Insurance

  10. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 15, Noes 1

  11. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Insurance, Ayes 12, Noes 4

  12. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-18-2011 by committee on Rules

  14. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to refer to committee on Health, Ayes 41, Noes 55

  16. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  17. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37

  18. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  19. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 58, Noes 38

  20. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  21. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37

  22. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  23. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37

  24. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Nygren

  25. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Refused to table Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 37, Noes 59

  26. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 59, Noes 37

  27. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Richards and Barca

  28. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 59, Noes 37

  29. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  30. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  32. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 57, Noes 39, Paired 2

  33. Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  35. Oct 19, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Insurance and Housing

  36. Oct 25, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  37. Mar 23, 2012 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote