Assembly Bill 216
Maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing the view of outdoor advertising signs along highways under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation
Topics: Billboard, Building, Plants, Road, Transportation, Department of: Roads
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Aug 9, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 21, 2012
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 230
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways that, for maintenance purposes, are under its jurisdiction, which are generally state trunk highways (including interstate highways) but do not include connecting highways. DOT must provide for the care and protection of trees and other roadside vegetation. DOT must also cut, trim, or remove, or allow others to cut, trim, or remove, trees and other vegetation in order to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway without DOT's consent.
The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, which includes state trunk highways and connecting highways, and current state law incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs (signs) within 660 feet of, or beyond 660 feet but visible (and erected for the purpose of being visible) from, the main-traveled way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. Exceptions to this prohibition include, with some restrictions, signs advertising activities conducted on the property on which the signs are located; signs located beyond 660 feet of the highway in urban areas; and signs located within 660 feet of the highway in certain business, industrial, or commercial areas.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, DOT administers a permit system for the maintenance and removal by sign owners of vegetation obstructing the view of signs along state trunk highways, including interstate highways. DOT may issue permits to sign owners for the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in the highway right-of-way if, within various specified distances along the highway, the vegetation obstructs motorists' view of the face of a sign. A permit authorizes the sign owner, or a third-party contractor employed by the sign owner, to trim, remove, or relocate obstructing vegetation to the extent necessary to eliminate the obstruction and restore an unobstructed view of the sign for the applicable specified distance along the highway. A permit must specify the vegetation or the portion of the highway right-of-way to which the permit applies. Each permit must require a sign owner that removes planted vegetation to either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. DOT must present to the sign owner DOT's calculation of the value of the planted vegetation, and the sign owner may elect to relocate the planted vegetation or to reimburse DOT in the amount calculated by DOT.
This bill makes various changes to DOT's permit system for maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing signs, including the following:
1. The bill replaces various sign viewing standards with a single standard: that a sign owner is eligible for a permit to trim or remove vegetation if, for a distance of 500 continuous feet within the 1,000 feet distance motorists travel immediately before reaching the sign, the vegetation obstructs the view of any portion of the face of the sign. The bill also eliminates an exception that allowed DOT to issue a permit for a noncontinuous 500 feet viewing distance.
2. The bill specifies that DOT must issue permits to eligible applicants. Also under the bill, DOT permits authorize the trimming or removal, but not the relocation, of obstructing vegetation.
3. The bill eliminates the requirement that a permittee that removes planted vegetation must either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. The bill replaces this requirement with the requirement that a permittee that removes vegetation with a diameter of four inches or more must plant replacement vegetation to compensate for the vegetation removed. DOT must determine where the replacement vegetation is to be planted, but it must be planted in the highway right-of-way within ten miles of the location where the vegetation was removed.
4. The bill eliminates a requirement under current law that, under certain conditions, a sign owner applying for a permit must, at the time of the application, provide written notice of the application to any adjacent property owner and to the applicable municipality. The bill also eliminates a provision of current law requiring DOT, within 30 days of receiving an application, to determine whether the application is complete and to return it to the applicant if incomplete.
5. The bill eliminates a provision of current law that a permit may not authorize the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in existence prior to the erection of the sign obstructed by the vegetation. The bill replaces this provision with a provision that DOT may not issue a permit to trim, remove, or relocate vegetation obstructing the view of a sign that is less than five years old (calculated from when DOT first collected the sign's permit fee).
6. The bill eliminates a provision of current law allowing DOT to require as a condition or restriction under a permit that the work authorized under the permit meet standards established by DOT. However, the bill retains current law that DOT has authority to supervise and determine how the work authorized under a permit is carried out.
7. The bill expands the definition of "vegetation," for purposes of the bill, to include grass. The bill also eliminates the distinction between various other types of vegetation, including "natural vegetation," "planted vegetation," and "specimen trees."
Who's behind it
17 lawmakers are its . 15 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 25 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Honadel · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeffrey Stone · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Chad Weininger · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (8)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Elizabeth Coggs · Democrat, Assembly
- Glenn Grothman · Republican, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Terry Moulton · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 76 to 18 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican
Yes (76)
- Alvin Ott (R, 3)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- Amy Sue Vruwink (D, 70)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Andy Jorgensen (D, 43)
- Bill Kramer (R, 97)
- Bob Ziegelbauer (I, 25)
- Chad Weininger (R, 4)
- Chris Danou (D, 92)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Mason (D, 66)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dan Meyer (R, 34)
- Daniel LeMahieu (R, 59)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Dean Knudson (R, 30)
- Don Pridemore (R, 22)
- Donna Seidel (D, 85)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Erik Severson (R, 28)
- Evan Wynn (R, 43)
- Fred Clark (D, 81)
- Garey Bies (R, 1)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- Jeff Fitzgerald (R, 39)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeffrey Stone (R, 82)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Knilans (R, 44)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Klenke (R, 88)
- John Murtha (R, 29)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- Jon Richards (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Karl Van Roy (R, 90)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Keith Ripp (R, 42)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Mark Honadel (R, 21)
- Mary Williams (R, 87)
- Michelle Litjens (R, 56)
- Mike Endsley (R, 26)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Pat Strachota (R, 58)
- Paul F. Farrow (R, 33)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Richard Spanbauer (R, 53)
- Robert Turner (D, 61)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Roger Rivard (R, 75)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Scott Suder (R, 69)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Steve Kestell (R, 27)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Thomas Larson (R, 67)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tony Staskunas (D, 15)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
No (18)
- Barbara Toles (D, 17)
- Brett Hulsey (D, 78)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Louis Molepske Jr. (D, 71)
- Margaret Krusick (D, 7)
- Mark Pocan (D, 78)
- Mark Radcliffe (D, 92)
- Penny Bernard Schaber (D, 57)
- Sandy Pasch (D, 10)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
Didn't vote (5)
- David Cullen (D, 13)
- Elizabeth Coggs (D, 10)
- John Steinbrink (D, 65)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Tamara Grigsby (D, 18)
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 10, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Apr 6, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 230.
-
Apr 5, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 13, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 12, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.
-
Mar 8, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 22, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.
-
Feb 22, 2012
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Assembly passed it, 76 to 18.
-
Feb 21, 2012
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 16, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 16, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 1.
-
Feb 14, 2012
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Sep 20, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 12, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 9, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.
-
Aug 9, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Honadel, Bies, Brooks, Kestell, LeMahieu, Mursau, Nerison, Nygren, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Stone, Strachota, Tiffany, Van Roy, Vruwink, Weininger and Wynn;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Darling, Lasee, Moulton, Olsen and Schultz
- Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Sep 12, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Petrowski
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Representative E. Coggs added as a coauthor
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 22, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections
- Mar 8, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senator Hansen added as a cosponsor
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012
- Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 230
- Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly
Published 4-19-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote