Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 216

Maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing the view of outdoor advertising signs along highways under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation

Topics: Billboard, Building, Plants, Road, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 9, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 230

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways that, for maintenance purposes, are under its jurisdiction, which are generally state trunk highways (including interstate highways) but do not include connecting highways. DOT must provide for the care and protection of trees and other roadside vegetation. DOT must also cut, trim, or remove, or allow others to cut, trim, or remove, trees and other vegetation in order to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway without DOT's consent.

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, which includes state trunk highways and connecting highways, and current state law incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs (signs) within 660 feet of, or beyond 660 feet but visible (and erected for the purpose of being visible) from, the main-traveled way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. Exceptions to this prohibition include, with some restrictions, signs advertising activities conducted on the property on which the signs are located; signs located beyond 660 feet of the highway in urban areas; and signs located within 660 feet of the highway in certain business, industrial, or commercial areas.

Read the full summary

Under current law, DOT administers a permit system for the maintenance and removal by sign owners of vegetation obstructing the view of signs along state trunk highways, including interstate highways. DOT may issue permits to sign owners for the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in the highway right-of-way if, within various specified distances along the highway, the vegetation obstructs motorists' view of the face of a sign. A permit authorizes the sign owner, or a third-party contractor employed by the sign owner, to trim, remove, or relocate obstructing vegetation to the extent necessary to eliminate the obstruction and restore an unobstructed view of the sign for the applicable specified distance along the highway. A permit must specify the vegetation or the portion of the highway right-of-way to which the permit applies. Each permit must require a sign owner that removes planted vegetation to either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. DOT must present to the sign owner DOT's calculation of the value of the planted vegetation, and the sign owner may elect to relocate the planted vegetation or to reimburse DOT in the amount calculated by DOT.

This bill makes various changes to DOT's permit system for maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing signs, including the following:

1. The bill replaces various sign viewing standards with a single standard: that a sign owner is eligible for a permit to trim or remove vegetation if, for a distance of 500 continuous feet within the 1,000 feet distance motorists travel immediately before reaching the sign, the vegetation obstructs the view of any portion of the face of the sign. The bill also eliminates an exception that allowed DOT to issue a permit for a noncontinuous 500 feet viewing distance.

2. The bill specifies that DOT must issue permits to eligible applicants. Also under the bill, DOT permits authorize the trimming or removal, but not the relocation, of obstructing vegetation.

3. The bill eliminates the requirement that a permittee that removes planted vegetation must either relocate the planted vegetation or reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. The bill replaces this requirement with the requirement that a permittee that removes vegetation with a diameter of four inches or more must plant replacement vegetation to compensate for the vegetation removed. DOT must determine where the replacement vegetation is to be planted, but it must be planted in the highway right-of-way within ten miles of the location where the vegetation was removed.

4. The bill eliminates a requirement under current law that, under certain conditions, a sign owner applying for a permit must, at the time of the application, provide written notice of the application to any adjacent property owner and to the applicable municipality. The bill also eliminates a provision of current law requiring DOT, within 30 days of receiving an application, to determine whether the application is complete and to return it to the applicant if incomplete.

5. The bill eliminates a provision of current law that a permit may not authorize the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in existence prior to the erection of the sign obstructed by the vegetation. The bill replaces this provision with a provision that DOT may not issue a permit to trim, remove, or relocate vegetation obstructing the view of a sign that is less than five years old (calculated from when DOT first collected the sign's permit fee).

6. The bill eliminates a provision of current law allowing DOT to require as a condition or restriction under a permit that the work authorized under the permit meet standards established by DOT. However, the bill retains current law that DOT has authority to supervise and determine how the work authorized under a permit is carried out.

7. The bill expands the definition of "vegetation," for purposes of the bill, to include grass. The bill also eliminates the distinction between various other types of vegetation, including "natural vegetation," "planted vegetation," and "specimen trees."

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. 15 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Feb 16, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 76 to 18 · Feb 21, 2012 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (76)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 230.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  6. Mar 12, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  7. Mar 8, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Elections.

  9. Feb 22, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 76 to 18.

  11. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Feb 16, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 1.

  14. Feb 14, 2012

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Sep 20, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Sep 12, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Aug 9, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  18. Aug 9, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Honadel, Bies, Brooks, Kestell, LeMahieu, Mursau, Nerison, Nygren, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Stone, Strachota, Tiffany, Van Roy, Vruwink, Weininger and Wynn;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Darling, Lasee, Moulton, Olsen and Schultz

  2. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Sep 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Petrowski

  6. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative E. Coggs added as a coauthor

  7. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation

  9. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  10. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  11. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  12. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  23. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  24. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  25. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  26. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a cosponsor

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  37. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 230

  38. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote