Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 216

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

maintenance and removal of vegetation obstructing the view of outdoor advertising signs along highways under the jurisdiction of the Department of Transportation.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for

maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways that, for maintenance

purposes, are under its jurisdiction, which are generally state trunk highways

(including interstate highways) but do not include connecting highways. DOT must

provide for the care and protection of trees and other roadside vegetation. DOT must

also cut, trim, or remove, or allow others to cut, trim, or remove, trees and other

vegetation in order to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally

prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other

vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway without DOT's consent.

The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising

along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, which includes state trunk

highways and connecting highways, and current state law incorporates these

requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions, the erection or

maintenance of outdoor advertising signs (signs) within 660 feet of, or beyond 660

feet but visible (and erected for the purpose of being visible) from, the main-traveled

way of an interstate or federal-aid primary highway. Exceptions to this prohibition

include, with some restrictions, signs advertising activities conducted on the

property on which the signs are located; signs located beyond 660 feet of the highway

in urban areas; and signs located within 660 feet of the highway in certain business,

industrial, or commercial areas.

Under current law, DOT administers a permit system for the maintenance and

removal by sign owners of vegetation obstructing the view of signs along state trunk

highways, including interstate highways. DOT may issue permits to sign owners for

the trimming, removal, or relocation of vegetation in the highway right-of-way if,

within various specified distances along the highway, the vegetation obstructs

motorists' view of the face of a sign. A permit authorizes the sign owner, or a

third-party contractor employed by the sign owner, to trim, remove, or relocate

obstructing vegetation to the extent necessary to eliminate the obstruction and

restore an unobstructed view of the sign for the applicable specified distance along

the highway. A permit must specify the vegetation or the portion of the highway

right-of-way to which the permit applies. Each permit must require a sign owner

that removes planted vegetation to either relocate the planted vegetation or

reimburse DOT for the value of the planted vegetation. DOT must present to the sign

owner DOT's calculation of the value of the planted vegetation, and the sign owner

may elect to relocate the planted vegetation or to reimburse DOT in the amount

calculated by DOT.

This bill makes various changes to DOT's permit system for maintenance and

removal of vegetation obstructing signs, including the following:

1. The bill replaces various sign viewing standards with a single standard: that

a sign owner is eligible for a permit to trim or remove vegetation if, for a distance of

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Honadel (R) , Kestell (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Mursau (R) , Nerison (R) , Nygren (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Staskunas (D) , Stone (R) , Strachota (R) , Tiffany (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vruwink (D) , Weininger (R) , Wynn (R)

8 cosponsors

Darling (R) , E. Coggs (D) , Grothman (R) , Hansen (D) , Lasee (R) , Moulton (R) , Olsen (R) , Schultz (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

Passed 13–0 Feb 16, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18

Passed 76–18 Feb 21, 2012 official source full page

Aye · 76

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Mar 12, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Honadel, Bies, Brooks, Kestell, LeMahieu, Mursau, Nerison, Nygren, Spanbauer, Staskunas, Stone, Strachota, Tiffany, Van Roy, Vruwink, Weininger and Wynn;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Darling, Lasee, Moulton, Olsen and Schultz

  2. Aug 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Sep 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Petrowski

  6. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative E. Coggs added as a coauthor

  7. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation

  9. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  10. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  12. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  13. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 1

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 76, Noes 18

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation and Elections

  23. Mar 8, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  24. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  25. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Transportation and Elections, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  26. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  27. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a cosponsor

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  37. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 230

  38. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012