Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the purchase of food by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin-System.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law generally authorizes state agencies to purchase materials,
supplies, or equipment under certain circumstances. With some exceptions,
purchases for which the estimated cost exceeds $25,000 require bids to be invited or
proposals to be solicited and the order must be awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder or most competitive sealed proposal. In determining the lowest responsible
bidder the agency must consider the location of the agency, the quantities of the
articles to be supplied, the conformity of the bids with the specifications in the
invitation to bid, and the purpose for which the materials, supplies, or equipment are
required and the delivery date. In determining the most competitive sealed proposal,
the agency must consider factors outlined in the solicitation for competitive sealed
proposals.
This bill creates several exceptions to these provisions if the Board of Regents
of the University of Wisconsin System (board) is purchasing food. First, when the
board is considering bids or proposals for the purchase of food, factors other than
price may not comprise more than 25 percent of the total factors used to determine
the lowest bid or most competitive proposal. In addition, under this bill, if the food
is produced within a 100-mile radius of the site to which the food will be delivered,
the board may purchase that food without inviting bids or soliciting proposals if the
estimated cost does not exceed $50,000. Finally, this bill creates an exception to the
requirement to award to the lowest responsible bidder or most competitive sealed
proposal by allowing the board to give the award to a person who submits a bid or
proposal that is no more than 20 percent higher than the apparent low bid or than
the most competitive proposal if the food was produced within a 100-mile radius of
the site to which the food will be delivered.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Colleges and Universities and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 55
Failed 35–55 Mar 15, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Clark, Molepske Jr, Spanbauer, Mason, Berceau, Hebl, Fields, Roys, Pope-Roberts and Barca;Cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Miller, Taylor, Erpenbach and Wirch
- Feb 8, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities
- Mar 4, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 9, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Colleges and Universities and take up, Ayes 35, Noes 55
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1