Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 223

Awarding costs in administrative agency actions

Topics: Administrative procedure, Court: Procedure, State agencies

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Aug 18, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if an individual, small nonprofit corporation, or a small business is the prevailing party in an administrative agency contested case, in an action brought by an agency, or in a judicial review proceeding under s. 227.485 (6), that prevailing party is entitled to an award of costs unless the court finds the agency was substantially justified in taking its position or if such an award would be unjust under the circumstances. If the prevailing party is an individual, that party is not entitled to recover costs if the party's federal adjusted gross income was $150,000 or more in each of the three years prior to the commencement of the action. Current law also requires hearing examiners and courts in this state to be guided by federal case law as of November 20, 1985, when interpreting these provisions governing costs to prevailing parties.

This bill eliminates financial and entity size limitations for prevailing parties to be eligible to receive costs in administrative agency actions, allowing an award of costs to any trust or person, other than the state, that is a prevailing party unless the court finds the agency was substantially justified in taking its position or if such an award would be unjust under the circumstances. This bill also eliminates the requirement that hearing examiners and courts rely on federal case law as of November 20, 1985, when interpreting these provisions governing costs to prevailing parties.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 9 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 26, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Oct 7, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Sep 30, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Sep 29, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Sep 29, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Sep 27, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Sep 22, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Sep 7, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Aug 18, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  11. Aug 18, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Aug 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Honadel, Spanbauer, Wynn, Knilans, Jacque, Brooks, Kuglitsch and Stroebel;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman, Taylor, Lasee and Holperin

  2. Aug 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Sep 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Sep 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Sep 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Sep 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  11. Sep 30, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Oct 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate