Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
the disclosure of electronic juvenile court records to law enforcement agencies and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the director of state courts has established an automated
information system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation Programs
(CCAP), that contains information about cases filed in the circuit courts in this state,
including cases filed in the courts assigned to exercise jurisdiction under the
Juvenile Justice Code (juvenile courts). Records of the juvenile court, however, are
confidential and may not be opened to inspection, nor may their contents be
disclosed, except under certain statutory exceptions or by an order of the juvenile
court. Currently, those exceptions include an exception that requires a juvenile court
to disclose its records on the request of a law enforcement agency to review those
records for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal gang activity.
This bill permits the juvenile court to transfer to a law enforcement agency the
electronic records of the juvenile court, permits the director of state courts to use
CCAP to facilitate that transfer of those electronic records, and requires the director
of state courts to determine what types of information from those electronic records
may be transferred to a law enforcement agency. In addition, the bill requires a law
enforcement agency to keep any information from those records transferred to the
agency confidential and permits a law enforcement agency to use or allow access to
that information only for the purpose of investigating alleged criminal or delinquent
activity. Also, the bill requires an individual who is allowed access to any information
from those electronic records to keep the information confidential and to use and
further disclose the information only for the purpose of investigating alleged
criminal or delinquent activity. Finally, the bill provides for a forfeiture of not more
than $5,000 for any person who intentionally discloses information in violation of the
bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Vos, Bernier, Brooks, Jacque, Kaufert, Kestell, Knodl, Petersen, Strachota, Stroebel and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Lazich, Olsen and Wanggaard
- Aug 30, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 16, 2011 · Assembly
Representative Ballweg added as a coauthor
- Feb 28, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Vos and Richards
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1