Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
limiting the number of individual income tax checkoffs.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, an individual income tax check-off procedure exists that
allows an individual who files a return to designate any amount of additional
payment or any amount of a refund due for the endangered resources program.
Similar checkoffs exist to provide payments to several other programs, including a
veterans trust fund, prostate cancer research, multiple sclerosis programs, a fire
fighters memorial, which is temporary and expires after $400,000 is designated, and
a breast cancer research program, and to provide a donation to a professional football
stadium district.
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011, taxpayers may not have
the opportunity to make such a designation to more than 10 checkoffs, not including
temporary checkoffs, and no temporary checkoffs may be created after December 31,
2011. The bill also prohibits the Department of Revenue (DOR) from placing more
than 10 checkoffs on the income tax form, and repeals the current law provision that
requires DOR to highlight certain checkoffs with a symbol. Other than a checkoff
created in a bill that is introduced in both houses of the legislature before June 1,
2011, if any checkoff is created after December 31, 2011, and before January 1, 2015,
it may not appear on the tax form, and no designations may be made to the checkoff,
before January 1, 2015.
Beginning in September 2014, and every three years thereafter, the bill
requires the secretary of revenue to rank the checkoffs in order of the amount of
designations received during the previous three-year period.
If nine checkoffs exist, not including temporary checkoffs, only the top six
checkoffs, in terms of designations received, may appear on the tax form for the next
three years, and the seventh place on the tax form will be taken by a checkoff that
hasn't received any designations during the previous three-year period.
If more than 10 checkoffs exist, not including temporary checkoffs, only the top
eight checkoffs, in terms of designations received, may appear on the tax form for the
next three years, and the ninth and tenth places on the tax form will be taken by
checkoffs that haven't received any designations during the previous three-year
period. The new checkoffs that appear on the form will be selected by the legislature
from among all checkoffs authorized by law.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Marklein (R) , Strachota (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 1
Passed 9–1 Oct 25, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Strachota, Thiesfeldt and Marklein;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman and Holperin
- Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means
- Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota
- Oct 6, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Strachota
- Oct 19, 2011 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 1
- Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly
- Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:03 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1