Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 242

Limiting the number of individual income tax checkoffs

Topics: Income tax: Return

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 6, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, an individual income tax check-off procedure exists that allows an individual who files a return to designate any amount of additional payment or any amount of a refund due for the endangered resources program.

Similar checkoffs exist to provide payments to several other programs, including a veterans trust fund, prostate cancer research, multiple sclerosis programs, a fire fighters memorial, which is temporary and expires after $400,000 is designated, and a breast cancer research program, and to provide a donation to a professional football stadium district.

Read the full summary

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2011, taxpayers may not have the opportunity to make such a designation to more than 10 checkoffs, not including temporary checkoffs, and no temporary checkoffs may be created after December 31, 2011. The bill also prohibits the Department of Revenue (DOR) from placing more than 10 checkoffs on the income tax form, and repeals the current law provision that requires DOR to highlight certain checkoffs with a symbol. Other than a checkoff created in a bill that is introduced in both houses of the legislature before June 1, 2011, if any checkoff is created after December 31, 2011, and before January 1, 2015, it may not appear on the tax form, and no designations may be made to the checkoff, before January 1, 2015.

Beginning in September 2014, and every three years thereafter, the bill requires the secretary of revenue to rank the checkoffs in order of the amount of designations received during the previous three-year period.

If nine checkoffs exist, not including temporary checkoffs, only the top six checkoffs, in terms of designations received, may appear on the tax form for the next three years, and the seventh place on the tax form will be taken by a checkoff that hasn't received any designations during the previous three-year period.

If more than 10 checkoffs exist, not including temporary checkoffs, only the top eight checkoffs, in terms of designations received, may appear on the tax form for the next three years, and the ninth and tenth places on the tax form will be taken by checkoffs that haven't received any designations during the previous three-year period. The new checkoffs that appear on the form will be selected by the legislature from among all checkoffs authorized by law.

Who's behind it

3 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 3 are Republicans.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (3)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Ways and Means vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 1 · Oct 25, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 1, 2011

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Oct 25, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Oct 25, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.

  5. Sep 8, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Sep 8, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Sep 6, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  8. Sep 6, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Strachota, Thiesfeldt and Marklein;Cosponsored by Senators Grothman and Holperin

  2. Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota

  6. Oct 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Strachota

  7. Oct 19, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota

  8. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 9, Noes 1

  10. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  11. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Representatives August and Craig added as coauthors

  13. Feb 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Strachota

  14. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:03 A.M. on 3-13-2012 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  16. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote