Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 250

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

regulating text messages as telephone solicitations for purposes of the no call list.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law regulates "telephone solicitation," which is defined as the

unsolicited initiation of a telephone conversation for the purpose of encouraging the

recipient of the telephone call to purchase property, goods, or services. With certain

exceptions, current law prohibits a telephone solicitor from making a telephone

solicitation to a residential telephone customer if the customer's telephone number

is included in a directory maintained by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and

Consumer Protection that lists customers who do not wish to receive telephone

solicitations. The directory is commonly referred to as the "no call list." A violation

of the prohibition is subject to a forfeiture of $100. The prohibition does not apply

to a telephone solicitation that is: 1) made by or on behalf of a nonprofit organization;

2) made in response to a request for the solicitation; or 3) made to a current client of

the seller that is the reason for the solicitation.

This bill defines "telephone solicitation" so that it also includes the unsolicited

initiation of a text message for the purpose of encouraging the recipient of the text

message to purchase property, goods, or services. As a result, subject to the

exceptions described above, the bill prohibits a person from making such a text

message to a residential telephone customer whose telephone number is included in

the no call list.

Sponsors

Introduced by: C. Taylor (D) , Endsley (R) , J. Ott (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kestell (R) , Pasch (D) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Strachota (R) , Tranel (R)

8 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Kedzie (R) , Lassa (D) , Moulton (R) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D) , Wanggaard (R) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Feb 16, 2012 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Petryk, Jacque, Pasch, Kestell, J. Ott, Tranel, Strachota, Sinicki, Kapenga, Ripp, C. Taylor and Endsley;Cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Carpenter, Wirch, Kedzie, Moulton, Schultz, Taylor and Lassa

  2. Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy

  3. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hebl

  4. Oct 26, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection and Personal Privacy, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules

  9. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  10. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1