Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 260

Changing the elements that must be included in a county development plan

Topics: Maps, Municipality: Planning, Regional planning, Village

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 15, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a county may create a county zoning agency, which is a policy-making body in the county that determines the broad outlines and principles governing the county's administrative zoning powers. The county agency may direct the preparation of a county development plan. Currently, if a county creates a development plan, the plan must include a master plan adopted by a city, or village.

If one exists, it must also include, without changes, the city's or village's official map.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, the inclusion of a city's or village's master plan in a county development plan is optional. The bill also eliminates the requirement that any official map be included without changes.

Who's behind it

6 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 20, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Sep 28, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Sep 15, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  5. Sep 15, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kerkman, Brooks, Jacque, Kestell, LeMahieu and Stroebel;Cosponsored by Senators Moulton and Holperin

  2. Sep 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Sep 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Kerkman

  5. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate