Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 275

Authorizing the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands to make revenue obligation trust fund loans to certain municipalities, authorizing the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands to make certain investments, application requirements for certain state trust fund loans, persons authorized to execute certificates of indebtedness, and collection procedures for outstanding state trust fund loans

Topics: Public Lands, Board of Commissioners of

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 18, 2011. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 93 to 0

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 31 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 71

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 21, 2011: “Published 12-1-2011”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands (BCPL) may invest moneys in the common school fund, the normal school fund, the university fund, and the agricultural college fund (trust funds) in certain specified investments.

Under current law, BCPL also administers a state trust fund loan program under which it makes loans from moneys belonging to the trust funds to school districts, local governments, and certain other public entities for certain public purposes.

Read the full summary

This bill authorizes BCPL, in addition to its authority under current law to make loans that are the general obligation of the borrower, to make loans that are secured by the revenue generated by the activity for which the loan is made (revenue obligation loans). Under the bill, BCPL may make a revenue obligation loan only if it is made for the purpose of financing, or refinancing, a project that is secured by a pledge and first priority assignment of the revenue that the municipality will receive from moneys generated by the project or for the purpose of financing, or refinancing, project costs that are secured by a pledge and first priority assignment of tax increments that will be allocated to the municipality for those costs by the Department of Revenue under the tax incremental financing program. The bill provides that a revenue obligation loan may be made for any term not exceeding 30 years and may be made payable in installments. The bill further specifies that if a revenue obligation loan is secured by a pledge and assignment of tax increments, then the loan may not exceed an amount that would require the municipality to make annual payments of more than 80 percent of the municipality's shared revenue payments received in the previous year.

The bill also does the following:

1. Provides that, in addition to BCPL's authority under current law to invest in bonds issued by this state, or by a town, village, city, county, or school district, it may also invest in notes or other instruments of indebtedness issued by any of those entities.

2. Authorizes BCPL to invest in bonds, notes, and other instruments of indebtedness issued by a metropolitan sewerage district or a technical college district.

3. Authorizes BCPL to invest in financial institution accounts that are insured by a deposit insurance corporation.

4. Specifies that all bonds, notes, or other instruments of indebtedness and securities purchased by BCPL must be deposited in a manner determined by the board. Under current law, the deposit must be made with the secretary of administration.

5. Provides that if BCPL makes a loan for the purpose of paying off existing indebtedness, the making of the loan and the payment of the existing indebtedness must be treated as if they occur simultaneously.

Who's behind it

13 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 6 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 12, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 93 to 0 · Oct 25, 2011 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (93)

Didn't vote (5)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 93, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 26, 2011

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 31 to 0 · Oct 27, 2011 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 31, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 21, 2011

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 18, 2011

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 71.

  3. Nov 15, 2011

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Oct 27, 2011

    The Senate passed it too, 31 to 0.

  5. Oct 26, 2011

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Oct 26, 2011

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  7. Oct 26, 2011

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Oct 26, 2011

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Oct 26, 2011

    The Senate received it.

  10. Oct 25, 2011

    The Assembly passed it, 93 to 0.

  11. Oct 25, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Oct 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Oct 12, 2011

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  14. Oct 4, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Sep 27, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Sep 23, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Urban and Local Affairs.

  17. Sep 23, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Hulsey, Marklein, Pocan, Knilans, Bewley, Krug, Mason, A. Ott, Turner, Jacque, Ripp and Clark;Cosponsored by Senators Schultz, Holperin and Taylor

  2. Sep 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Sep 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 4, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 11, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules

  9. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 93, Noes 0

  14. Oct 25, 2011 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  19. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Oct 26, 2011 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-27-2011 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  25. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 31, Noes 0

  26. Oct 27, 2011 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Oct 27, 2011 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  28. Nov 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  29. Nov 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-15-2011

  30. Nov 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-16-2011. 2011 Wisconsin Act 71

  31. Nov 21, 2011 · Assembly

    Published 12-1-2011

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote