Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
permitting an employer to refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony and preempting cities, villages, towns, and counties from adopting provisions concerning employment discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibit activity that is allowed under the state fair employment law.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
The current state fair employment law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits
discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record. That law
specifies, however, that it is not employment discrimination because of conviction
record to refuse to employ or to terminate from employment an individual who has
been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor, or other offense, the circumstances of which
substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job. This bill specifies that
it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for an employer to
refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been
convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony, whether or not
the circumstances of the felony substantially relate to the circumstances of the
particular job.
Under current constitutional and statutory home rule provisions, a city or
village may determine its own local affairs subject only to the Wisconsin Constitution
and to any enactment of the legislature that is of statewide concern and that affects
every city or village with uniformity. This bill states that the prohibition against
discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record under the state
fair employment law is a matter of statewide concern, requiring uniform
enforcement at the state, county, and municipal levels. As such, the bill prohibits any
county, city, village, or town from adopting any provision concerning employment
discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibits any activity that
is allowed under the state fair employment law.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 6, Noes 3
Passed 6–3 Dec 7, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Litjens, LeMahieu, Jacque, Craig, Knodl, Pridemore, Ziegelbauer, Thiesfeldt, Nass, Endsley, Petersen, Kuglitsch, T. Larson and Stroebel;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Lazich, Zipperer, Moulton and Galloway
- Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor and Workforce Development
- Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 6, Noes 3
- Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1