Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 286

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

permitting an employer to refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony and preempting cities, villages, towns, and counties from adopting provisions concerning employment discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibit activity that is allowed under the state fair employment law.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

The current state fair employment law, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits

discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record. That law

specifies, however, that it is not employment discrimination because of conviction

record to refuse to employ or to terminate from employment an individual who has

been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor, or other offense, the circumstances of which

substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job. This bill specifies that

it is not employment discrimination because of conviction record for an employer to

refuse to employ or to bar or terminate from employment an individual who has been

convicted of a felony and who has not been pardoned for that felony, whether or not

the circumstances of the felony substantially relate to the circumstances of the

particular job.

Under current constitutional and statutory home rule provisions, a city or

village may determine its own local affairs subject only to the Wisconsin Constitution

and to any enactment of the legislature that is of statewide concern and that affects

every city or village with uniformity. This bill states that the prohibition against

discrimination in employment based on arrest or conviction record under the state

fair employment law is a matter of statewide concern, requiring uniform

enforcement at the state, county, and municipal levels. As such, the bill prohibits any

county, city, village, or town from adopting any provision concerning employment

discrimination based on arrest or conviction record that prohibits any activity that

is allowed under the state fair employment law.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Craig (R) , Endsley (R) , Jacque (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Litjens (R) , Nass (R) , Petersen (R) , Pridemore (R) , Stroebel (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Ziegelbauer (I)

5 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Galloway (R) , Lazich (R) , Moulton (R) , Zipperer (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 6, Noes 3

Passed 6–3 Dec 7, 2011 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch, Litjens, LeMahieu, Jacque, Craig, Knodl, Pridemore, Ziegelbauer, Thiesfeldt, Nass, Endsley, Petersen, Kuglitsch, T. Larson and Stroebel;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Lazich, Zipperer, Moulton and Galloway

  2. Sep 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor and Workforce Development

  3. Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor and Workforce Development, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  7. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1