Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 299

Law enforcement officers and firearms in school zones and certain injunctions against law enforcement officers

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals: Felony, Firearms and dangerous weapons, Police, School: Building, Women

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 3, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law generally prohibits a person from possessing or discharging a firearm in, or on the grounds of, a school or within 1,000 feet from the grounds of a school. Current law contains several exemptions to this prohibition, including law enforcement officers who are acting in their official capacity and, if the person is not in or on the grounds of a school, a person who holds a license to carry a concealed weapon. This bill eliminates the requirement that the officer be acting in his or her official capacity if the officer is authorized to carry a firearm; the officer is not the subject of any disciplinary action by the law enforcement agency that could result in the suspension or loss of his or her law enforcement authority; the officer is qualified under standards established by the law enforcement agency to use a firearm; the law enforcement officer is not prohibited under federal law from possessing a firearm; the firearm is not a machine gun or a destructive device, such as a bomb; the officer is not carrying a firearm silencer; and the officer is not under the influence of an intoxicant. This bill also excepts from the prohibition former law enforcement officers who are carrying certain identification that identifies the type of firearm he or she is qualified to carry and who are not under the influence of an intoxicant.

Also, current law prohibits any person who is subject to a domestic abuse injunction or a child abuse injunction from possessing a firearm. The prohibition, however, does not apply to a peace officer while he or she is on duty or, if required as a condition of employment, while he or she is off duty. A peace officer who violates the prohibition without being subject to the exemption is guilty of a Class G felony.

Read the full summary

Under this bill, a peace officer who violates the prohibition without being subject to the exemption is guilty of violating the injunction and, as such, is subject to a fine of up to $1,000 or a term of imprisonment for up to nine months, or both.

Who's behind it

2 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 0 · Feb 14, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 14, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 14, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  4. Jan 25, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Jan 24, 2012

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Dec 12, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Oct 10, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Oct 7, 2011

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Oct 3, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections.

  10. Oct 3, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kleefisch and Stroebel;Cosponsored by Senators Kedzie and Holperin

  2. Oct 3, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections

  3. Oct 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Zepnick added as a coauthor

  4. Oct 10, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 10, 2011 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. Dec 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Representative Wynn added as a coauthor

  7. Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 25, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Jan 27, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Hebl and Kleefisch

  10. Feb 3, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Clark and Kleefisch

  11. Feb 9, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  13. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice and Corrections, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  14. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote