Assembly Bill 302
Regulation of nursing homes, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and making an appropriation
Topics: Health Services, Department of: Supportive living and treatment, Medical assistance, Nursing homes and adult care
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 5, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Federal and state requirements for nursing homes Under current law, a nursing home that receives Medicaid or Medicare funding for the care of a resident is subject to both federal and state requirements. The Department of Health Services (DHS) enforces both federal and state requirements for nursing homes. Currently, for nursing homes that are Medicaid and Medicare providers, DHS may issue both federal and state citations for the same practice and may recommend federal remedies and impose state sanctions. This bill prohibits DHS from issuing a notice of violation of a state requirement to a nursing home that is a Medical Assistance or Medicare provider if DHS has, in a statement of deficiency, cited the nursing home for a violation of a federal requirement that is based on the same facts.
Under current law, DHS may seek an injunction in court to enjoin the repeated violation of the state's nursing home statutes or a rule promulgated under the authority of the state's nursing home statutes. The bill allows DHS to seek an injunction to enjoin repeated violation of certain federal requirements related to the operation of a nursing home.
Read the full summary Show less
Monetary penalties Under current law, DHS may assess a forfeiture against a nursing home for a violation of a state requirement. There is no time limit for DHS to assess a forfeiture for a violation. Nursing homes must pay forfeitures to DHS within ten days after receipt of notice of imposition of the forfeiture or after receipt of the final decision after exhaustion of administrative review. If a nursing home does not contest a notice of violation and a forfeiture and pays the forfeiture within ten days after receipt of the notice, DHS must reduce the forfeiture amount by 35 percent.
The bill requires DHS to impose a forfeiture within 120 days of notifying a nursing home of a violation or DHS loses the authority to impose a forfeiture. The bill changes to 60 days the time period by which a nursing home must pay forfeitures to DHS after receipt of the notice of imposition or the final decision after exhaustion of administrative review, and also changes to 60 days the time period within which a nursing home may pay a forfeiture and have the forfeiture amounts reduced by 35 percent.
Appeals Currently, in order to appeal a DHS finding that the nursing home violated a state requirement, a nursing home must request a hearing on the finding within ten days of receiving notice of the violation. If DHS assesses a forfeiture for the violation and the nursing home wishes to appeal the forfeiture, the nursing home must request a separate hearing on the forfeiture within ten days of receiving notice of a contested action. Upon request of the nursing home, the hearing on the finding of violation may be stayed until DHS assesses a forfeiture so that the hearing on the finding of violation and the hearing on the forfeiture may be consolidated.
The bill extends the deadline for a nursing home to request a hearing on a finding that the nursing home violated a state requirement to 60 days after receipt of the notice of violation. The bill also extends the deadline for requesting a hearing on a forfeiture to 60 days after receipt of notice of the forfeiture. The bill further provides that, if a nursing home timely appeals both a finding of violation and a forfeiture, the hearings on the violation and the forfeiture will be consolidated.
Conditional and probationary licenses Currently, in addition to the right to impose a forfeiture on a nursing home for violations, DHS may issue a conditional license to a nursing home in which DHS finds that a class "A" or a class "B" violation continues to exist. (A class "A" violation creates a condition or occurrence relating to the operation and maintenance of a nursing home that presents a substantial probability that death or serious mental or physical harm to a nursing home resident will result. A class "B" violation creates a condition or occurrence relating to the operation and maintenance of a nursing home that directly threatens the health, safety, or welfare of a nursing home resident.) Issuing a conditional license revokes any outstanding license held by the nursing home.
This bill expands the standard for issuance by DHS of a conditional license for a nursing home to also include a continuing violation of federal law that constitutes immediate jeopardy or actual harm not involving immediate jeopardy to a nursing home resident.
Under current law, an applicant for a nursing home license that has not been previously licensed to operate a nursing home or whose nursing home is not operating at the time of application is issued a probationary license. To obtain a regular license, DHS inspects the nursing home to determine whether the nursing home meets the requirements for licensure. The bill specifies that a nursing home operating under a probationary license must also substantially comply with requirements under certain federal regulations related to the operation of a nursing home, if applicable, in order to obtain a regular license.
Suspension of admissions Under current law, DHS must suspend new admissions to a nursing home if the nursing home received notices of a class "A" violation or three or more class "B" violations in the previous 12 months; and if the nursing home received notices of a class "A" violation or three or more class "B" violations in any 12-month period during the three years immediately preceding the previous 12 months. Suspension of admissions begins 90 days after a nursing home receives its last notice of a class "A" or class "B" violation if DHS determines that the violation is uncorrected 90 days after the last notice or on the day that DHS makes a return visit to the nursing home and determines that the violation has not been corrected. A suspension must remain in effect until DHS determines that the nursing home has corrected all class "A" and class "B" violations.
This bill expands the standard for suspension of new admissions to a nursing home to include circumstances under which a nursing home received written notice of a violation that involved immediate jeopardy to a resident; a class "A" violation;
or three or more class "B" violations or violations that constituted actual harm not involving immediate jeopardy to a resident. These circumstances must have occurred both in the previous 15 months and in any 15-month period during the 36 months immediately preceding the previous 15 months. Under the bill, a suspension of admissions may begin only 90 days after a nursing home receives its last notice of a violation if DHS determines that the violation in uncorrected 90 days after the last notice. Suspension of admissions must remain in effect until DHS determines that the nursing home has corrected the violation in question.
Suspension or revocation of licensure Currently, DHS may, after providing notice to a nursing home applicant or licensee, suspend or revoke the license if DHS finds that the nursing home substantially failed to comply with applicable state statutes or rules. No state or federal funds passing through the state treasury may be paid to a nursing home that does not have a valid license. This bill also permits DHS to suspend or revoke a nursing home license if the nursing home has substantially failed to comply with specified state law or with federal requirements related to the operation of a nursing home.
Notices of violation In certain circumstances under current law, DHS must provide a notice of violation to a nursing home, such as the presence in a nursing home of a class "A" or "B" violation. The department currently is not required to serve a notice of violation if the nursing home reports the violation to DHS and the violation occurs and remains uncorrected despite the nursing home's every reasonable effort to prevent and correct the violation. This bill expands the circumstances under which DHS is not required to serve a notice of violation to include situations in which a nursing home reports the violation to DHS and has corrected the violation.
Quality improvements This bill allows DHS to distribute moneys, including civil money penalties collected under a certain federal regulation, for innovative projects designed to protect the property and the health, safety, and welfare of nursing home residents and to improve the efficiency and cost effectiveness of the operation of nursing home facilities. Also, under the bill, DHS must establish and maintain a quality assurance and improvement committee to review proposals and award moneys for those innovative projects.
Who's behind it
24 lawmakers are its . 20 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 31 names Hide the names
Authors (24)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Doyle · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Kestell · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- John Nygren · Republican, Assembly
- Warren Petryk · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Richard Spanbauer · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Strachota · Republican, Assembly
- Thomas Larson · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Karl Van Roy · Republican, Assembly
- Robin Vos · Republican, Assembly
- Mary Williams · Republican, Assembly
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Pam Galloway · Republican, Senate
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
- Mary Lazich · Republican, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Jennifer Shilling · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 2 · Oct 20, 2011
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2012
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Oct 20, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 20, 2011
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 2.
-
Oct 19, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 13, 2011
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 13, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 5, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care.
-
Oct 5, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Knodl, Wynn, Nygren, Ballweg, Bernier, Bewley, Brooks, Danou, Doyle, Kestell, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Molepske Jr, Mursau, A. Ott, Petryk, Ripp, Spanbauer, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Van Roy, Williams and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Lazich, Holperin, Schultz, Shilling, Vinehout and Wirch
- Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Aging and Long-Term Care
- Oct 13, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 13, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 19, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote