Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
regulation of nursing homes, requiring the exercise of rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Federal and state requirements for nursing homes
Under current law, a nursing home that receives Medicaid or Medicare funding
for the care of a resident is subject to both federal and state requirements. The
Department of Health Services (DHS) enforces both federal and state requirements
for nursing homes. Currently, for nursing homes that are Medicaid and Medicare
providers, DHS may issue both federal and state citations for the same practice and
may recommend federal remedies and impose state sanctions. This bill prohibits
DHS from issuing a notice of violation of a state requirement to a nursing home that
is a Medical Assistance or Medicare provider if DHS has, in a statement of deficiency,
cited the nursing home for a violation of a federal requirement that is based on the
same facts.
Under current law, DHS may seek an injunction in court to enjoin the repeated
violation of the state's nursing home statutes or a rule promulgated under the
authority of the state's nursing home statutes. The bill allows DHS to seek an
injunction to enjoin repeated violation of certain federal requirements related to the
operation of a nursing home.
Monetary penalties
Under current law, DHS may assess a forfeiture against a nursing home for a
violation of a state requirement. There is no time limit for DHS to assess a forfeiture
for a violation. Nursing homes must pay forfeitures to DHS within ten days after
receipt of notice of imposition of the forfeiture or after receipt of the final decision
after exhaustion of administrative review. If a nursing home does not contest a notice
of violation and a forfeiture and pays the forfeiture within ten days after receipt of
the notice, DHS must reduce the forfeiture amount by 35 percent.
The bill requires DHS to impose a forfeiture within 120 days of notifying a
nursing home of a violation or DHS loses the authority to impose a forfeiture. The
bill changes to 60 days the time period by which a nursing home must pay forfeitures
to DHS after receipt of the notice of imposition or the final decision after exhaustion
of administrative review, and also changes to 60 days the time period within which
a nursing home may pay a forfeiture and have the forfeiture amounts reduced by 35
percent.
Appeals
Currently, in order to appeal a DHS finding that the nursing home violated a
state requirement, a nursing home must request a hearing on the finding within ten
days of receiving notice of the violation. If DHS assesses a forfeiture for the violation
and the nursing home wishes to appeal the forfeiture, the nursing home must request
a separate hearing on the forfeiture within ten days of receiving notice of a contested
action. Upon request of the nursing home, the hearing on the finding of violation may
be stayed until DHS assesses a forfeiture so that the hearing on the finding of
violation and the hearing on the forfeiture may be consolidated.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , Bewley (D) , Brooks (R) , Danou (D) , Doyle (D) , Kestell (R) , Knodl (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Molepske Jr (D) , Mursau (R) , Nygren (R) , Petryk (R) , Ripp (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Strachota (R) , T. Larson (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tranel (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Williams (R) , Wynn (R)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2
Passed 4–2 Oct 20, 2011 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Knodl, Wynn, Nygren, Ballweg, Bernier, Bewley, Brooks, Danou, Doyle, Kestell, T. Larson, LeMahieu, Molepske Jr, Mursau, A. Ott, Petryk, Ripp, Spanbauer, Strachota, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Van Roy, Williams and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Lazich, Holperin, Schultz, Shilling, Vinehout and Wirch
- Oct 5, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Aging and Long-Term Care
- Oct 13, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 13, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 19, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 20, 2011 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-25-2011 by committee on Rules
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1