Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 313

Unclassified division administrators in the state civil service system

Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, Civil service, Legislature: Finance, Joint Committee on, Public employee

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 7, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

During the 2011-12 legislative session, 2011 Wisconsin Acts 10 and 32 increased the number of unclassified division administrators in executive branch state agencies. An unclassified division administrator serves at the pleasure of his or her appointing authority, while a classified division administrator may only be removed from the position for cause.

2011 Wisconsin Act 10 also permitted appointing authorities in executive branch agencies to designate any managerial position as an unclassified division administrator position.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates the increases in the number of unclassified division administrator positions that were authorized in 2011 Wisconsin Acts 10 and 32 and eliminates the ability of an appointing authority to designate any managerial position as an unclassified division administrator position. The bill also requires the secretary of administration to submit a plan to the Joint Committee on Finance (JCF) for adjusting appropriations and authorized classified and unclassified positions that result from the reduction in the number of unclassified division administrators under this bill. If the cochairpersons of JCF do not notify the secretary that JCF has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the plan within 14 working days after the date of his or her submittal, the secretary may implement the plan. If within 14 working days after the date of the submittal by the secretary the cochairpersons notify him or her that JCF has scheduled a meeting for the purpose of reviewing the plan, the secretary may implement the plan only with the approval of JCF.

Who's behind it

28 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 28 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 9, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Oct 7, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs.

  4. Oct 7, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Barca, Seidel, Sinicki, Mason, Pasch, Ringhand, Jorgensen, C. Taylor, Pocan, Milroy, Bernard Schaber, Richards, Kessler, Doyle, Steinbrink, Turner, Grigsby, Vruwink, Roys, Young, Hintz, Toles, Molepske Jr, Zepnick, Danou, Pope-Roberts, Hebl and Clark;Cosponsored by Senators Miller, Vinehout, Wirch, Lassa and S. Coggs

  2. Oct 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Nov 9, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate