Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
creation of a Wisconsin election campaign fund, making appropriations, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill authorizes each individual filing a state income tax return who has a
tax liability or is owed a refund to designate that $1 of general purpose revenue be
transferred to an election campaign fund administered by the Government
Accountability Board (GAB) and the state treasurer. Under the bill, any candidate
for a partisan state office, except district attorney, who receives at least 6 percent of
the total vote cast on all ballots for the office the candidate seeks at the September
primary and whose name is certified as a candidate in the general election is eligible
to receive a grant from the fund to finance campaign expenses. The bill places the
names of independent candidates on the September primary ballot in order to permit
these candidates to qualify to receive grants. However, as under current law, a voter
who votes for a party candidate for any office is not permitted to vote for any
candidates not representing that party, but including independent candidates. The
independent candidates continue to appear on the general election ballot regardless
of the number of votes they receive at the primary. A candidate for state
superintendent of public instruction or justice of the supreme court who is nominated
at the primary may also qualify to receive grants. In addition, a candidate for a state
office at a special partisan election may qualify to receive a grant if he or she
represents a party whose candidate for the same office at the most recent general
election received at least 6 percent of the total vote cast for the office or if he or she
actually receives at least 6 percent of the total vote cast for the office at the special
election. A candidate whose name appears on the ballot at a special election for the
office of state superintendent may also qualify.
The moneys in the fund are apportioned as follows: 1) in those years in which
there is an election for supreme court justice, candidates for that office may receive
8 percent of the money in the fund which is divided equally among them; 2) in those
years in which there is an election for state superintendent, candidates for that office
may receive 8 percent of the money in the fund which is divided equally between
them; 3) the remainder is apportioned among the candidates for partisan state
executive offices, who may receive 25 percent of the remaining money in the fund,
and candidates for legislative office, who may receive 75 of the remaining money in
the fund. The fund is further apportioned among candidates for the executive offices
according to a specified formula. All eligible candidates for the same office may
receive equal grants. If a candidate for an office does not accept a grant, the amount
for which the candidate could have qualified is potentially payable to any opposing
candidates for the same office who accept grants. To complete his or her
qualification, a candidate must receive contributions of money from individuals
during a specified period in amounts of $100 or less cumulatively from each
individual. For a candidate for a statewide office or any candidate at a special
election, the contributions must equal at least 5 percent of the candidate's statutory
disbursement (expenditure) level. For other candidates, the contributions must
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Doyle (D) , Fields (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Milroy (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pasch (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Election and Campaign Reform and take up, Ayes 33, Noes 54
Failed 33–54 Mar 15, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jorgensen, Hintz, Barca, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Clark, Doyle, Fields, Grigsby, Hebl, Hulsey, Molepske Jr, Milroy, Pasch, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Ringhand, Roys, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Turner and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Carpenter, King, C. Larson, Lassa and Wirch
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Election and Campaign Reform
- Oct 18, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 3, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 8, 2012 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Election and Campaign Reform and take up, Ayes 33, Noes 54
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1