Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 322

Accessible instructional materials for students with disabilities enrolled in the University of Wisconsin System or the Technical College System

Topics: Blind and visually impaired, Data processing, Parochial and private educational institutions, Persons with disabilities, Technical College System Board, Textbook, University of Wisconsin

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 20, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 12, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 13, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 124

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 22, 2012: “Published 4-2-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current state law, the University of Wisconsin System (UW System) and the Technical College System (TCS) may not deny to a student admission to, participation in, or the benefits of, or discriminate against a student in, any service, program, course, or facility because of the student's disability. In addition, under current federal law, a college, university, or other postsecondary institution, including a private postsecondary institution, may not exclude a student from participation in, deny a student the benefits of, or subject a student to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Federal regulations specify that a postsecondary institution receiving federal financial assistance must ensure that no student with a disability is denied the benefits of, excluded from participation in, or otherwise subjected to discrimination because of the absence of educational auxiliary aids for students with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills.

This bill permits an institution or college campus within the UW System or a technical college within the TCS (institution of higher education), on behalf of a student who is blind or visually impaired, or who has a specific learning disability or other disability affecting the activity of reading, and who needs reasonable accommodations to read (student with a disability), to request a publisher to provide instructional material in electronic format by submitting to the publisher a request for that material that complies with the bill and a request for permission to convert or to arrange for the conversion of that material into Braille, large print texts, audio recordings, digital texts, digital talking books, or any other medium or format for the presentation of instructional materials, other than standard print, that a student with a disability needs to make those materials accessible to the student (alternative format). Within 15 working days after receipt of the request the publisher must provide the instructional material to the institution of higher education at no additional cost.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, a request for instructional material in electronic format must certify that: 1) a copy of the instructional material in a standard format has been purchased for use by a student with a disability; 2) the student has a disability that prevents the student from using instructional material in a standard format; and 3) the instructional material is for use by the student in connection with a course at the institution of higher education in which the student is enrolled. In addition, the publisher may require the student to sign a statement agreeing that the student will use the electronic copy of the instructional material solely for his or her own educational purposes and that the student will not copy or distribute the instructional material for use by others.

Under the bill, instructional material provided by a publisher in electronic format must: 1) maintain the structural integrity of the original instructional material, which means that all of the information provided in printed instructional material, including the text of sidebars; the table of contents; chapter headings and subheadings; footnotes; indexes; glossaries; bibliographies; nontextual elements, such as pictures, illustrations, graphs, charts, and screenshots; and any other data that are pertinent to the instructional material, is included when that printed instructional material is provided in electronic format; 2) be compatible with commonly used Braille translation or speech synthesis software; 3) include corrections and revisions as necessary; and 4) be in an electronic format that is mutually agreed to between the publisher and the requester or, if the publisher and the requester cannot agree to a format, be in a format that is suitable for the creation of instructional material in an alternative format and that maintains the structural integrity of the original material as much as possible.

The bill permits an institution of higher education to use instructional material in electronic format provided under the bill solely to convert that material into an alternative format for use by a student with a disability or to otherwise assist such a student. The bill also permits an institution of higher education that converts instructional material into an alternative format to share the alternative format version of the material with any other institution of higher education that is serving a student with a disability, or with an entity that is authorized under the federal Copyright Act to reproduce and distribute previously published works in alternative formats exclusively for use by persons with disabilities and that commonly provides instructional materials in alternative formats to students enrolled in institutions of higher education.

In addition, current law prohibits any person from denying to another the full and equal enjoyment of any public place of accommodation or amusement because of disability (public accommodations law). This bill provides that a publisher of instructional material is considered to be a public place of accommodation or amusement and that any publisher that refuses to provide instructional material as required under the bill is in violation of the public accommodations law.

The requirements and prohibitions created in the bill, however, do not apply to a publisher or manufacturer of instructional material that is a member of a nationwide exchange network that facilitates the delivery of instructional material in alternative format to students with disabilities, if that material is delivered within seven days after a request for the material.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 2, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 12, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 22, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 20, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 124.

  3. Mar 16, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 13, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 13, 2012

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  6. Mar 12, 2012

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Mar 7, 2012

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  8. Mar 7, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Mar 7, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  10. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Mar 6, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Mar 6, 2012

    29 more representatives signed on in support.

  13. Mar 2, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  14. Mar 2, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.

  15. Mar 1, 2012

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. Mar 1, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Dec 5, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Nov 14, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Nov 1, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Oct 12, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  21. Oct 12, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Knilans, Seidel, Bewley, Bies, Endsley, Grigsby, Krug, Pope-Roberts, Steinbrink, Turner, C. Taylor and Mason;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Erpenbach, S. Coggs, Lasee, C. Larson, Risser and Taylor

  2. Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Knilans and Seidel

  7. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Representative Wynn added as a coauthor

  10. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  11. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  12. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules

  14. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca, Pasch, Berceau, Hebl, Ringhand, Molepske Jr, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, E. Coggs, Fields, Billings, Zepnick, Vruwink, Vos, Tranel, Ripp, Nass, Brooks, Kuglitsch, J. Ott, Marklein, Thiesfeldt, Petersen, Kleefisch, Toles, Young, Loudenbeck and Spanbauer added as coauthors

  15. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  17. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  23. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  24. Mar 7, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  25. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  26. Mar 12, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a cosponsor

  28. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Senator Vinehout added as a cosponsor

  29. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 13, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. Mar 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-16-2012

  37. Mar 20, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-19-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 124

  38. Mar 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-2-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote