Assembly Bill 322
Accessible instructional materials for students with disabilities enrolled in the University of Wisconsin System or the Technical College System
Topics: Blind and visually impaired, Data processing, Parochial and private educational institutions, Persons with disabilities, Technical College System Board, Textbook, University of Wisconsin
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 20, 2012. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 12, 2011
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 6, 2012
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Mar 13, 2012
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2011 Wisconsin Act 124
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 22, 2012: “Published 4-2-2012”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current state law, the University of Wisconsin System (UW System) and the Technical College System (TCS) may not deny to a student admission to, participation in, or the benefits of, or discriminate against a student in, any service, program, course, or facility because of the student's disability. In addition, under current federal law, a college, university, or other postsecondary institution, including a private postsecondary institution, may not exclude a student from participation in, deny a student the benefits of, or subject a student to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Federal regulations specify that a postsecondary institution receiving federal financial assistance must ensure that no student with a disability is denied the benefits of, excluded from participation in, or otherwise subjected to discrimination because of the absence of educational auxiliary aids for students with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills.
This bill permits an institution or college campus within the UW System or a technical college within the TCS (institution of higher education), on behalf of a student who is blind or visually impaired, or who has a specific learning disability or other disability affecting the activity of reading, and who needs reasonable accommodations to read (student with a disability), to request a publisher to provide instructional material in electronic format by submitting to the publisher a request for that material that complies with the bill and a request for permission to convert or to arrange for the conversion of that material into Braille, large print texts, audio recordings, digital texts, digital talking books, or any other medium or format for the presentation of instructional materials, other than standard print, that a student with a disability needs to make those materials accessible to the student (alternative format). Within 15 working days after receipt of the request the publisher must provide the instructional material to the institution of higher education at no additional cost.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, a request for instructional material in electronic format must certify that: 1) a copy of the instructional material in a standard format has been purchased for use by a student with a disability; 2) the student has a disability that prevents the student from using instructional material in a standard format; and 3) the instructional material is for use by the student in connection with a course at the institution of higher education in which the student is enrolled. In addition, the publisher may require the student to sign a statement agreeing that the student will use the electronic copy of the instructional material solely for his or her own educational purposes and that the student will not copy or distribute the instructional material for use by others.
Under the bill, instructional material provided by a publisher in electronic format must: 1) maintain the structural integrity of the original instructional material, which means that all of the information provided in printed instructional material, including the text of sidebars; the table of contents; chapter headings and subheadings; footnotes; indexes; glossaries; bibliographies; nontextual elements, such as pictures, illustrations, graphs, charts, and screenshots; and any other data that are pertinent to the instructional material, is included when that printed instructional material is provided in electronic format; 2) be compatible with commonly used Braille translation or speech synthesis software; 3) include corrections and revisions as necessary; and 4) be in an electronic format that is mutually agreed to between the publisher and the requester or, if the publisher and the requester cannot agree to a format, be in a format that is suitable for the creation of instructional material in an alternative format and that maintains the structural integrity of the original material as much as possible.
The bill permits an institution of higher education to use instructional material in electronic format provided under the bill solely to convert that material into an alternative format for use by a student with a disability or to otherwise assist such a student. The bill also permits an institution of higher education that converts instructional material into an alternative format to share the alternative format version of the material with any other institution of higher education that is serving a student with a disability, or with an entity that is authorized under the federal Copyright Act to reproduce and distribute previously published works in alternative formats exclusively for use by persons with disabilities and that commonly provides instructional materials in alternative formats to students enrolled in institutions of higher education.
In addition, current law prohibits any person from denying to another the full and equal enjoyment of any public place of accommodation or amusement because of disability (public accommodations law). This bill provides that a publisher of instructional material is considered to be a public place of accommodation or amusement and that any publisher that refuses to provide instructional material as required under the bill is in violation of the public accommodations law.
The requirements and prohibitions created in the bill, however, do not apply to a publisher or manufacturer of instructional material that is a member of a nationwide exchange network that facilitates the delivery of instructional material in alternative format to students with disabilities, if that material is delivered within seven days after a request for the material.
Who's behind it
12 lawmakers are its . 8 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 24 names Hide the names
Authors (12)
- Janet Bewley · Democrat, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Chris Taylor · Democrat, Assembly
- Mike Endsley · Republican, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Knilans · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- John Steinbrink · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (12)
- Barca, Pasch, Berceau, Hebl, Ringhand, Molepske Jr, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, E. Coggs, Fields, Billings, Zepnick, Vruwink, Vos, Tranel, Ripp, Nass, Brooks, Kuglitsch, J. Ott, Marklein, Thiesfeldt, Petersen, Kleefisch, Toles, Young, Loudenbeck and Spanbauer
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Julie M. Lassa · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
- Evan Wynn · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 0 · Mar 2, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 12, 2012
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 22, 2012
The new law was published.
-
Mar 20, 2012
The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 124.
-
Mar 16, 2012
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 13, 2012
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 13, 2012
2 more senators signed on in support.
-
Mar 12, 2012
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Mar 7, 2012
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Mar 7, 2012
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Mar 7, 2012
The Senate received it.
-
Mar 6, 2012
The Assembly passed it.
-
Mar 6, 2012
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Mar 6, 2012
29 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Mar 2, 2012
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 2, 2012
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 0.
-
Mar 1, 2012
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 1, 2012
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 5, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 14, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 1, 2011
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 12, 2011
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.
-
Oct 12, 2011
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Knilans, Seidel, Bewley, Bies, Endsley, Grigsby, Krug, Pope-Roberts, Steinbrink, Turner, C. Taylor and Mason;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Erpenbach, S. Coggs, Lasee, C. Larson, Risser and Taylor
- Oct 12, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities
- Nov 1, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 5, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Knilans and Seidel
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly
Representative Wynn added as a coauthor
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 by committee on Rules
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Representatives Barca, Pasch, Berceau, Hebl, Ringhand, Molepske Jr, Zamarripa, Doyle, Hulsey, E. Coggs, Fields, Billings, Zepnick, Vruwink, Vos, Tranel, Ripp, Nass, Brooks, Kuglitsch, J. Ott, Marklein, Thiesfeldt, Petersen, Kleefisch, Toles, Young, Loudenbeck and Spanbauer added as coauthors
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor
- Mar 7, 2012 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 12, 2012 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-13-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senator Hansen added as a cosponsor
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Senator Vinehout added as a cosponsor
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a second time
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Mar 13, 2012 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 13, 2012 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 16, 2012 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-16-2012
- Mar 20, 2012 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 3-19-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 124
- Mar 22, 2012 · Assembly
Published 4-2-2012
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote