Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 374

Creating a preference in state procurement for Wisconsin-based businesses

Topics: Purchasing, Government, State agencies

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 14, 2011

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c). See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law generally requires that state agencies or other authorized state purchasing agents award orders and contracts for materials, supplies, equipment, and contractual services to the entity that provides the lowest responsible bid or most advantageous competitive proposal. Current law contains several exceptions to this requirement. One exception is a preference for Wisconsin producers, distributors, suppliers, and retailers over any out-of-state vendor that is domiciled in a jurisdiction that grants a preference to vendors domiciled in that jurisdiction. This bill deletes this exception and, instead, requires state agencies and other purchasing agents to maximize the awards given to businesses that have at least 50 percent of their operations in Wisconsin or that plan to have at least 50 percent of their operations in Wisconsin in the next year. To accomplish this goal, the state agency or purchasing agent may purchase materials, supplies, equipment, and contractual services from any such business that submits a bid or proposal that is no more than 5 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal.

Who's behind it

18 lawmakers are its ⁠. 17 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 16, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Assembly Organization.

  3. Dec 19, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Dec 14, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Dec 13, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Dec 7, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Dec 6, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Dec 5, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Nov 29, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Nov 28, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Nov 23, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Nov 22, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 18, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Nov 17, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Nov 14, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs.

  16. Nov 14, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Molepske Jr, Vruwink, Clark, Zepnick, C. Taylor, Danou, Wynn, Pocan, Hebl, Turner, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Fields, Roys, Sinicki, Mason and Ringhand;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Holperin, Hansen and Wirch

  2. Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Nov 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Nov 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Dec 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Dec 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Dec 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Dec 19, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

More in the glossary