Skip to content

Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session

AB 374

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

creating a preference in state procurement for Wisconsin-based businesses.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law generally requires that state agencies or other authorized state

purchasing agents award orders and contracts for materials, supplies, equipment,

and contractual services to the entity that provides the lowest responsible bid or most

advantageous competitive proposal. Current law contains several exceptions to this

requirement. One exception is a preference for Wisconsin producers, distributors,

suppliers, and retailers over any out-of-state vendor that is domiciled in a

jurisdiction that grants a preference to vendors domiciled in that jurisdiction. This

bill deletes this exception and, instead, requires state agencies and other purchasing

agents to maximize the awards given to businesses that have at least 50 percent of

their operations in Wisconsin or that plan to have at least 50 percent of their

operations in Wisconsin in the next year. To accomplish this goal, the state agency

or purchasing agent may purchase materials, supplies, equipment, and contractual

services from any such business that submits a bid or proposal that is no more than

5 percent higher than the apparent low bid or most advantageous proposal.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Clark (D) , Danou (D) , Fields (D) , Hebl (D) , Mason (D) , Molepske Jr (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ringhand (D) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D) , Turner (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wynn (R) , Zepnick (D)

4 cosponsors

Hansen (D) , Holperin (D) , Lassa (D) , Wirch (D)

Full history

  1. Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Molepske Jr, Vruwink, Clark, Zepnick, C. Taylor, Danou, Wynn, Pocan, Hebl, Turner, Berceau, Bernard Schaber, Fields, Roys, Sinicki, Mason and Ringhand;Cosponsored by Senators Lassa, Holperin, Hansen and Wirch

  2. Nov 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs

  3. Nov 17, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 18, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Nov 22, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Nov 28, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 29, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Dec 5, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Dec 6, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Dec 7, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Dec 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Dec 14, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Dec 19, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Homeland Security and State Affairs and referred to committee on Assembly Organization pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  17. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1