Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 384

Weapons that may be used to hunt certain animals and requirements for establishing open hunting seasons for those animals

Topics: Children, Firearms and dangerous weapons, Game, Game bird, Game: Hunting, Natural Resources, Department of: Hunting and fishing

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 6, 2012. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 16, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 21, 2012

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 6, 2012

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2011 Wisconsin Act 252

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 10, 2012: “Published 4-19-2012”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) issues hunting licenses that authorize the hunting of specified animals such as deer, bear, and small game. Those licenses also specify the type of weapon that may be used when hunting under those licenses. For example, a deer hunting license authorizes the holder of the license to only hunt with a firearm but a Class A bear license authorizes the license holder to hunt with a firearm, a bow and arrow, and under certain circumstances a crossbow. DNR also establishes seasons during which the hunting of certain animals with a specified weapon is allowed.

This bill expands the types of weapons that may be used under the authority of a deer, elk, wild turkey, small game, and Class A bear hunting license. Under the bill, each of these licenses authorizes a person to hunt with a firearm, a bow and arrow, or a crossbow. The bill eliminates the requirement that a person must be at least 65 years old or be disabled and hold a crossbow permit in order to hunt with a crossbow under the authority of any of these licenses. The bill does not change current law, which also allows the use of an airgun under the authority of a small game license. It also does not change current law under which a person who holds an archer hunting license may use a crossbow only if the person has attained the age of 65 or holds a permit that authorizes the use of a crossbow.

Read the full summary

This bill also specifies that, when DNR opens a hunting season for the purpose of hunting deer, elk, wild turkey, small game, or bear with any firearm, DNR must also allow the use of a bow and arrow and a crossbow during that open season by a person who holds the appropriate license. The bill further provides that, if DNR establishes an open season for hunting deer, elk, small game, wild turkey, or bear with a bow and arrow, but not with a firearm, then DNR may not open the season for hunting those animals with a crossbow. This prohibition does not apply under the bill to a person who is authorized under current law to use a crossbow based on age or disability.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Feb 7, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 35 · Feb 21, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 35”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 95 to 0 · Feb 21, 2012 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, I: Independent, R: Republican

Yes (95)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 1, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 10, 2012

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 6, 2012

    The governor signed it. It became 2011 Wisconsin Act 252.

  3. Apr 5, 2012

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 6, 2012

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 1, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  6. Feb 28, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.

  8. Feb 22, 2012

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly passed it, 95 to 0.

  10. Feb 21, 2012

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 7, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 7, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  13. Jan 18, 2012

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Dec 13, 2011

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Nov 16, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.

  16. Nov 16, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Tauchen, Craig, Sinicki, Petryk, Kleefisch, Rivard, Krug, Endsley and Spanbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Schultz and Taylor

  2. Nov 16, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources

  3. Dec 13, 2011 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Tauchen

  5. Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Tauchen

  6. Jan 18, 2012 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  9. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  10. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  11. Feb 7, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Feb 14, 2012 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2012 by committee on Rules

  13. Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Milroy

  14. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  16. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  17. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 35

  18. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0

  21. Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Feb 22, 2012 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources and Environment

  24. Feb 28, 2012 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  25. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  26. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Natural Resources and Environment, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  27. Mar 1, 2012 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  28. Mar 5, 2012 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-6-2012 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  29. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a second time

  30. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  31. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  32. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  33. Mar 6, 2012 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  34. Mar 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  35. Mar 15, 2012 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  36. Apr 5, 2012 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-5-2012

  37. Apr 6, 2012 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-6-2012. 2011 Wisconsin Act 252

  38. Apr 10, 2012 · Assembly

    Published 4-19-2012

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote