Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
overweight permits for vehicles transporting raw forest products.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, with limited exceptions, no person may operate on a
highway any vehicle or vehicle combination that exceeds certain statutory weight
limits unless the person obtains a permit issued by the Department of
Transportation (DOT) or a local highway authority. In issuing an overweight permit,
DOT may impose reasonable conditions and restrictions on the permittee as DOT
deems necessary for the safety of travel and protection of the highways.
Under current law, DOT may issue annual or consecutive month permits for the
transportation of raw forest products in vehicle combinations having a gross weight
not exceeding 98,000 pounds if the vehicle combination has six or more axles and
meets other criteria (RS permit). "Raw forest products" includes logs, poles,
cordwood, wood chips, sawdust, and pulpwood. A vehicle combination operated
under an RS permit is subject to certain operating restrictions, including that it
cannot be operated on an interstate highway or any highway or bridge with a posted
weight limit that is less than the vehicle combination's gross weight, except as
described immediately below.
Also under current law, DOT or a local highway authority may impose special
weight limits on highways that, because of weakness of the roadbed due to
deterioration or climatic conditions or other special or temporary conditions, would
likely be seriously damaged or destroyed in the absence of the special limits. If
special weight limits are imposed, the limits must be posted by highway signs along
the affected highways. The special weight limits apply regardless of whether a
vehicle is being operated under an overweight permit unless the permit expressly
authorizes the special weight limits to be exceeded. When DOT issues an RS permit,
the RS permit must expressly authorize the vehicle combination to exceed, on state
trunk highways and state trunk highway routes designated as connecting highways,
any special weight limits posted in connection with the thawing of frozen highways.
Under this bill, an RS permit issued by DOT may not contain any condition or
limitation imposed by DOT in connection with the thawing of frozen highways that
are not state trunk highways or connecting highways, except that the operation of
the vehicle combination under the RS permit is subject to posted weight limits on
these local highways.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
Passed 13–0 Feb 2, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 21, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mursau, Petrowski, Spanbauer, Tauchen, Clark, Bewley, Bernier, T. Larson, Endsley and Rivard;Cosponsored by Senators Galloway, Holperin and Jauch
- Nov 21, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation
- Dec 13, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 19, 2011 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Mursau
- Jan 24, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Mursau
- Jan 31, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2012 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-21-2012 by committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2012 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1