Skip to content
Bills from the 2011–12 session

Assembly Bill 391

Creating the Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act

Topics: Circuit court, International relations, Judgment, Personal property, Uniform legislation

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 23, 2011

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2012: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill adopts the 2005 Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. The bill requires the courts of this state to recognize a judgment of a court outside of the United States that grants or denies the recovery of a sum of money. Under the bill, to receive recognition by this state's courts, the foreign country's judgment must be final, conclusive, and enforceable. The bill excludes foreign country money judgments that are for taxes, for forfeitures or fines, or for support, maintenance, or a property division in connection with a domestic relations case.

Under the bill, this state's circuit courts are prohibited from recognizing a foreign country money judgment that was rendered by a judicial system that does not provide procedures compatible with the due process of law or that did not have jurisdiction over the defendant or the subject matter. The bill prohibits a circuit court from refusing to recognize the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction for a number of reasons, including if the defendant was personally served with process in the foreign country, the defendant voluntarily appeared in the foreign court, the defendant had agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the foreign court, the defendant was domiciled in the country where the foreign judgment was rendered, or the defendant was a business that was organized under the laws of, or had its principal place of business in, that foreign country.

Read the full summary

The bill allows the circuit courts to refuse to recognize a foreign country money judgment for a number of reasons, including if the defendant did not receive sufficient timely notice of the proceedings, if the judgment was obtained by fraud, if the claim for relief that resulted in the judgment is repugnant to the public policy of this state, if the judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment, or if the circumstances of the rendering of the judgment raise substantial doubt about the integrity of the foreign court that rendered the judgment.

The bill requires the circuit court, if it determines that the foreign country money judgment deserves recognition, to give the judgment full faith and credit in this state, and to enforce that judgment in the same manner as a judgment rendered by a court in this state.

Who's behind it

David Cullen, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 2 · Feb 22, 2012

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2012

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 22, 2012

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 22, 2012

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 2.

  4. Dec 15, 2011

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Nov 23, 2011

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  6. Nov 23, 2011

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative D. Cullen;Cosponsored by Senator Risser

  2. Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Dec 15, 2011 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative D. Cullen

  5. Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  7. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2

  8. Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote