Bills · 2011-2012 Regular Session
creating the Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill adopts the 2005 Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments
Recognition Act adopted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform
State Laws. The bill requires the courts of this state to recognize a judgment of a
court outside of the United States that grants or denies the recovery of a sum of
money. Under the bill, to receive recognition by this state's courts, the foreign
country's judgment must be final, conclusive, and enforceable. The bill excludes
foreign country money judgments that are for taxes, for forfeitures or fines, or for
support, maintenance, or a property division in connection with a domestic relations
case.
Under the bill, this state's circuit courts are prohibited from recognizing a
foreign country money judgment that was rendered by a judicial system that does
not provide procedures compatible with the due process of law or that did not have
jurisdiction over the defendant or the subject matter. The bill prohibits a circuit court
from refusing to recognize the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction for a number
of reasons, including if the defendant was personally served with process in the
foreign country, the defendant voluntarily appeared in the foreign court, the
defendant had agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the foreign court, the defendant
was domiciled in the country where the foreign judgment was rendered, or the
defendant was a business that was organized under the laws of, or had its principal
place of business in, that foreign country.
The bill allows the circuit courts to refuse to recognize a foreign country money
judgment for a number of reasons, including if the defendant did not receive
sufficient timely notice of the proceedings, if the judgment was obtained by fraud, if
the claim for relief that resulted in the judgment is repugnant to the public policy of
this state, if the judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment, or
if the circumstances of the rendering of the judgment raise substantial doubt about
the integrity of the foreign court that rendered the judgment.
The bill requires the circuit court, if it determines that the foreign country
money judgment deserves recognition, to give the judgment full faith and credit in
this state, and to enforce that judgment in the same manner as a judgment rendered
by a court in this state.
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2
Passed 6–2 Feb 22, 2012 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative D. Cullen;Cosponsored by Senator Risser
- Nov 23, 2011 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Dec 15, 2011 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 1, 2012 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative D. Cullen
- Feb 2, 2012 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 6, Noes 2
- Feb 22, 2012 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 23, 2012 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1